Reminds me of "The Electric Universe Theory" including the *Safire Project*
.
arth’s
relative charge into neutral space? Using something similar to this method?
From: H LV mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
Update...
I haven't done any experimen
Using something similar to this method?
>
>
>
> *From:* H LV
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
>
>
>
> Update...
>
> I haven't done any experiments yet, but I have refined my thinkin
Zell wrote:
Could there be a way to generate energy by ‘transmitting away’ the
earth’s relative charge into neutral space? Using something similar to
this method?
*From:*H LV
*Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
Update...
Could there be a way to generate energy by ‘transmitting away’ the earth’s
relative charge into neutral space? Using something similar to this method?
From: H LV
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
Update...
I haven't done any
Update...
I haven't done any experiments yet, but I have refined my thinking about
the nature of cooling or frigorific radiation.
Instead of striving for extremely low temperatures, I recently realised it
should be possible to look for cooling radiation between bodies which have
a large relative
Then again, it could be that most of the frigorific radiation that
could be detected with such instruments is either scattered or
absorbed by the atmosphere before it reaches the ground. This would
actually make sense from the standpoint of frigorific theory since the
upper atmosphere is colder
Some telescopes by virtue of their design should already be capable of
revealing cooling radiation if it existed.
eg. This telescope consists of a primary parabolic reflector and three
secondary mirrors which direct the collected light into an instrument
room several meters away from the primary
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 4:06 PM MSF wrote:
>
> Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition
> and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this test. The double
> parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved or disproved
> cooling
Don't forget to give us the result of your experiment if you do it.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, January 24th, 2022 at 9:06 PM, MSF wrote:
> Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition
> and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this
Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition and
preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this test. The double
parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved or disproved cooling
radiation. The dry ice at the focus would have been a
>From a fabrication standpoint here is an even simpler test for cooling
radiation.
It consists of a truncated cone lined with reflective mylar on the
inside. The wide end is open to the sky and a thermometer is located
at the vertex of the cone.
See diagram:
12 matches
Mail list logo
