[Vo]:Alternative Oct 6 calorimetry method based on T2 and one measured mass flow point

Another attempt to untangle Rossi’s mess: We’ve established that calorimetry for latest Oct 6 demo is badly flawed – due to awful temp measurement on secondary loop, so here is an alternative methodology to try and extract something useful. As the temperature in the reactor rises above 100°C

Re: [Vo]:Alternative Oct 6 calorimetry method based on T2 and one measured mass flow point

Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote: Safety: Don’t stand near the fat cat. 30 litres of 125°C water and steam at 1.5bar gauge pressure in a stupidly designed thin walled SQUARE pressure vessel with one whole side held on by a few bolts and engineered by someone of Rossi’s

Re: [Vo]:Alternative Oct 6 calorimetry method based on T2 and one measured mass flow point

All water heaters should have a pressure relief valve. Heck, your home water heater has one. T

Re: [Vo]:Alternative Oct 6 calorimetry method based on T2 and one measured mass flow point

Could putting the 3 reactors in the same box build a dangerous positive feedback in case one goes out of control? That's worrisome! Kaboom! That would make it to mainstream news! ;-) mic 2011/10/13 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com: All water heaters should have a pressure relief valve.  

Re: [Vo]:Alternative Oct 6 calorimetry method based on T2 and one measured mass flow point

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote: Could putting the 3 reactors in the same box build a dangerous positive feedback in case one goes out of control? I thought it was 4 reactors. T

Re: [Vo]:Alternative Oct 6 calorimetry method based on T2 and one measured mass flow point

Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote: Another attempt to untangle Rossi’s mess . . . So how do the results from this method look? Well the total steam enthalpy flow throughout the 100°C period from 13:46 to 19:59 is 52.7MJ (substantially greater than the 32.1MJ . . . That's