[Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

Mauro Lacy wrote on 6-4-10: I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks. At this point it sounds like something intentional to me. Jed wrote on 6-4-10: That can't be! BP will lose billions of dollars. There is no way anyone would cause this situation on purpose. No

[Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

Jon Stewart on the Daily Show quoted an interview with BP managing director Bob Dudley, conducted by George Stephanopoulos. Apparently, in the last 3 years, BP's facilities have been cited by OSHA for 760 egregious, willful safety violations. This compares to: Sunoco 8 ConocoPhillips 8

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks. At this point it sounds like something intentional to me. Don't they know about mechanical vices? As they have access to the base of the leaking pipe, a powerful enough mechanical vice can be used to slowly compress the

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

Mauro Lacy wrote: I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks. At this point it sounds like something intentional to me. That can't be! BP will lose billions of dollars. There is no way anyone would cause this situation on purpose. No saboteur could get within a

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

um, the pipe burst out. its a hollow column of rock. On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks. At this point it sounds like something intentional to me. Don't they know about mechanical vices?

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

On 06/03/2010 07:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Mauro Lacy wrote: I can't believe they can't stop the oil spill after more than six weeks. At this point it sounds like something intentional to me. That can't be! BP will lose billions of dollars. There is no way anyone would cause this

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

On 06/03/2010 08:22 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: On 06/03/2010 07:55 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote: um, the pipe burst out. its a hollow column of rock. Really? And what where they trying to cut some days ago? what, where, when? were I meant

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: I think that if they can cut it, they can certainly crunch it, and keep it pressed afterwards. But they should know better, isn't? They should, and experts generally do, but you never know. The vice can be left in place until a better way to solve the

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

. . .and a third part of the sea became blood. Odd that this spill from deep water looks red. T

RE: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

-Original Message- From: Terry Blanton . . .and a third part of the sea became blood. Odd that this spill from deep water looks red. Say, speaking of deepwater revelations - is the new BP well-cap one of the seven bowls?

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

On 06/03/2010 09:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: I think that if they can cut it, they can certainly crunch it, and keep it pressed afterwards. But they should know better, isn't? They should, and experts generally do,

Re: [Vo]:BP had 760 violations while Exxon had only 1

On 06/03/2010 10:50 PM, Jones Beene wrote: -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton . . .and a third part of the sea became blood. Odd that this spill from deep water looks red. Say, speaking of deepwater revelations - is the new BP well-cap one of the seven bowls? I