On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> His [Rossi's]only goal is
> to do a test quickly and conveniently that he himself finds convincing. He
> does not care whether the observers have trouble understanding it. He never
> listens to suggestions made by experts that would improve
Peter Heckert wrote:
> 1. There is no evidence that Rossi could not recirculate the condensate if
> he wanted to.
>
> There is evidence that he did not want or he couldnt.
>
I wouldn't want to if I were him. It sounds like a pain in the butt with no
benefit.
Suppose for the sake of argument, h
*Incrustation is a problem in this circuit.* DGT said they use organic heat
transfer agents in this closed circuit.
This is a problem of good control. (read please my previous
posting predicting the outcome of the Oct experiment.
I have NOT told thta the heat comes from some chemistry.
I think it
Am 08.10.2011 21:59, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Gluck mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
i have tried to describe my opinion re the latest Rossi event here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/10/seven-skinny-e-cats-eating-seven-fat.html
This says:
"- the primary steam hot wa
Peter Gluck wrote:
> i have tried to describe my opinion re the latest Rossi event here:
>
>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/10/seven-skinny-e-cats-eating-seven-fat.html
>
>
This says:
"- the primary steam hot water circuit was open and this can mean that the
E-cats still cannot work w
My dear friends,
i have tried to describe my opinion re the latest Rossi event here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/10/seven-skinny-e-cats-eating-seven-fat.html
My thanks to all of you who have commented on these forums, first
of all to Horace Heffner who has got the essence and the detai
6 matches
Mail list logo
