On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jimmy was tested and passed.
Terry
Edmund Storms wrote:
Stephen, why do you assume the child was any less supernatural than the
rabbi? It seems to me we have only two possibilities.
Oops; I didn't intend to assume that in my reponse. (But perhaps you
meant Steven... this conversation is confusing; too many Steves.) I
gues
Stephen, why do you assume the child was any less supernatural than the
rabbi? It seems to me we have only two possibilities.
1. Both the rabbi and the child were real and left the scene without
being noticed. This seems unlikely since help was at hand.
2. Both the rabbi and the child were an
Hi Stephen,
I see from your dissection of my recent essay that it is in your
nature to be extremely thorough - to leave no stone unturned. I must
confess that I have taken advantage of your predilection to be
thorough on at least one occasion, such as when I asked the Vort
membership questions on
OrionWorks wrote:
Perhaps against my better judgment I feel compelled to share the
following incident. FWIW I believe it is a truthful account.
A couple of years ago at one of those informal UFO meetings I attend
in the Milwaukee area I had an unusual conversation with a good
acquaintance of m
Thanks for the story Steven. Such occurrence can give us hope. As for
your questions? Ask yourself how you would communicate a message under
such circumstances if you were God. Intervention is out of the question
for reasons that have been debated for centuries. To me, the message to
the Israel
Perhaps against my better judgment I feel compelled to share the
following incident. FWIW I believe it is a truthful account.
A couple of years ago at one of those informal UFO meetings I attend
in the Milwaukee area I had an unusual conversation with a good
acquaintance of mine. I'll call him "Da
7 matches
Mail list logo
