Hi all and especially the historians.
I have recently been challenged about my vision of Morisson personality,
which I interpret under the vision of Charles Beaudette and the Titanic
paper of Jed
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusion.pdf#page=4
is there a more positive
I have met Douglas Morrison at ICCF-2 Como; actually my very short paper
aabout cold fusion statistics see :
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/my-cold-fusion-history-i.html
was prepared to show him that he does not understand statistics of cold
fusion experiments. He was actually a
Morrison published a series of news letters about cold fusion:
Morrison Cold Fusion Update No. 1, 2, 3 . . .
CFU 01.txt . . .
The earliest one I have on my disk is #6. It is completely negative, and
full of nonsense. As far as I know, the earlier ones were too.
Morrison was a racist, by my
http://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-scientific-dominance-is-a-done-deal-2014-6
I too have been disturbed by an automatic dismissal of science reported from
Asia. By sheer numbers, I think that will change.
Deception can be a terribel factor...
We all know many ex-smokers more fanatic against than many non-smokers.
It raise also something that I painfully realized, that cold fusion only
looks simple, but is awfully complex to harness...
not so differently from many technology however, like
this hierarchy of XXX (race, nations, science, labs) seems to be a strong
factor in the dismissal of cold fusion, and by many skeptics, maybe
innocently parroting, but probably comfortably applying inner hierarchy of
people and organizations.
I was shocked to see that results from India, China,
6 matches
Mail list logo
