Re: [Vo]:Energy Catalyzer Wiki : FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH!

2011-12-04 Thread Horace Heffner
On Dec 3, 2011, at 8:56 PM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote: I've look a gain, and I'm still suspect about using ZPE, because ZPE is only an energy that you cannot use to go below... by definition. When you get to nuclear sizes that lower limit is very large. Best regards, Horace Heffner

Re: [Vo]:Energy Catalyzer Wiki : FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH!

2011-12-04 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 04.12.2011 06:56, schrieb Alain dit le Cycliste: I've look a gain, and I'm still suspect about using ZPE, because ZPE is only an energy that you cannot use to go below... by definition. There are new reports that photons where extracted from ZPE:

Re: [Vo]:Energy Catalyzer Wiki : FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH!

2011-12-04 Thread Horace Heffner
On Dec 4, 2011, at 3:46 AM, Peter Heckert wrote: Am 04.12.2011 06:56, schrieb Alain dit le Cycliste: I've look a gain, and I'm still suspect about using ZPE, because ZPE is only an energy that you cannot use to go below... by definition. There are new reports that photons where extracted

Re: [Vo]:Energy Catalyzer Wiki : FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH!

2011-12-03 Thread Jouni Valkonen
I think that wiki article should be frozen for a while. There should be just basic information about the claim with _few_ *relevant* sources and only _public_ tests in January and October should be discussed. I think that three paragraph well written text should be enough. I do not see the urge

Re: [Vo]:Energy Catalyzer Wiki : FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH! FLAT EARTH!

2011-12-03 Thread Alain dit le Cycliste
I've look a gain, and I'm still suspect about using ZPE, because ZPE is only an energy that you cannot use to go below... by definition. note that about the law I talk about, GR, QP, TD1/2, I'm just very very suspect about theory that assume a violation of that laws... I know that in some