Re: [Vo]:FTL Antenna

2012-10-01 Thread David Roberson
every transmitter throughout the universe. I saw no discussion of the capability to utilize more than one channel. LOL Dave -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton To: vortex-l Sent: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 8:11 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:FTL Antenna On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Craig Haynie wrote: &g

RE: [Vo]:FTL Antenna

2012-10-01 Thread Jones Beene
SIDE note on FTL in the context of "instant messaging": One thing that is implied by this antenna patent is that FTL does not necessarily "reverse time". The idea of time-reversal always gets back to ontology via a very basic assumption about the nature of time. In fact FTL - in its most basic in

RE: [Vo]:FTL Antenna

2012-10-01 Thread Jones Beene
Don't know if this patent was brought up simply because of the claim of FTL, which is always of interest. Or ... if, coincidentally it seems to have employ a "spin Seebeck" effect, mentioned recently. The patent came out 10 years ahead of the discovery of this effect, but that could mean that it

Re: [Vo]:FTL Antenna

2012-10-01 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Craig Haynie wrote: > " The present invention has discovered the apparent existence of a new > dimension capable of acting as a medium for RE signals. Initial benefits > of penetrating this new dimension include sending RF signals faster than > the speed of light, e

[Vo]:FTL Antenna

2012-10-01 Thread Craig Haynie
" The present invention has discovered the apparent existence of a new dimension capable of acting as a medium for RE signals. Initial benefits of penetrating this new dimension include sending RF signals faster than the speed of light, extending the effective distance of RF transmitters at the sam