Interesting email from Puthoff to Sarfatti & Yahoo group. 

 

From: sarfattisciencesemin...@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:sarfattisciencesemin...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of JACK SARFATTI
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 10:58 PM
To: puth...@aol.com
Cc: Creon Levit; jfwoodw...@juno.com woodward; Jonathan Post; david kaiser;
Saul-Paul Sirag; Bernard J Carr; Basil Hiley; Sharon Weinberger; Gary
Bekkum; Sinziana Paduroiu; Paul Zielinski; Daniel Sheehan; David McMahon;
Nick Queen; Carlos Castro; Tony Smith; Brian Josephson; roger malina;
Maurice Alexis de Gosson de Varennes; Eric Davis; Russell Targ; fred alan
alan wolf; lynda williams; Gregory Benford; James N. Benford; michael
ibison; Burinskii A.Ya.; fred alan wolf; slimvirg...@yahoo.com; Mark Pesses;
Jacques Vallee; Bernard Haisch
Subject: [Starfleet Command] Puthoff's Casimir model vs. Jack's ZPE dark
matter model: it's dark matter's gravity not dark energy's antigravity that
stabilizes the electron

 

  

 

On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:55 PM, puth...@aol.com wrote:





 

 

In a message dated 6/1/2011 3:19:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
creon.le...@nasa.gov writes:

Nice paper, Hal.  Two questions: 

 

You state:

 

 "an inwardly- directed, divergent, electromagnetic vacuum fluctuation
radiation pressure stably balances the outwardly-directed, divergent coulomb
pressure."

 

Doesn't one need to analyze the derivatives with respect to all relevant
variables (radius, fluctuation spectrum, distribution of charge, etc) to say
it is "stable" ?

Actually, yes.  I did examine this in a scaled up version for finite-radius,
multi-charge clusters, found stability, and assumed it would apply here.  (A
little tricky to examine, e.g., radial perturbations for a point particle!) 

 

As I recall the quantum electromagnetic zero point Casimir force for a
spherical shell can be repulsive, hence not stabilize the classical electron
model.



You also state:

 

it would appear that the additive infinite negative mass in the QED approach
finds its source in a negative vacuum energy contribution as proposed in the
Casimir model. 

 

I.e. dark energy (at least it is in Jack's model) stabilizes the electron.

 

No, it's not the dark energy it's the dark matter that stabilizes the
electron.

 

In my theory

 

dark energy = virtual bosons

 

dark matter = virtual fermion-antifermion pairs

 

 

ZPE of virtual bosons is positive, w = -1

 

ZPE of virtual fermion-antifermion pairs is negative, w = -1

 

source term in Einstein's GR is  (energy density)(1 + 3w)

 

w = 0 in Newton's gravity theory

 

It's the new Einstein term 3w(energy density) that is not in Newton's theory
that does MY TRICK!

 

The interior of the electron's hollow shell has more virtual
electron-positron plasma density than virtual photon density in this Bohm
hidden variable model.

 

This has NOTHING WHATEVER TO DO WITH HAL'S QED CASIMIR FORCE, WHICH IS A
QUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT MECHANISM -ALSO THERE OF COURSE! IMPORTANT NOT TO
GARBLE THE TWO VERY DIFFERENT PHYSICAL MECHANISMS. One is pure gravity, the
other is pure electromagnetic, both depend on quantum vacuum fluctuations,
but with very different equations.

 

IT MAY VERY WELL BE SO THAT WE NEED HAL'S MECHANISM OUTSIDE THE SINGLE
ELECTRON SHELLS TO MAKE THE CHARGE CLUSTERS.





Yes, I see the two approaches as related.

 

They are related because 

 

1) Hal's is a purely EM interaction ZPE effect.

 

2) Mine is a purely gravitational interaction ZPE effect.

 

Both effects exist simultaneously.



 

Best regards,

Hal

 

__._,_.___

Reply to
<mailto:sarfa...@pacbell.net?subject=Re%3A%20Puthoff%27s%20Casimir%20model%2
0vs%2E%20Jack%27s%20ZPE%20dark%20matter%20model%3A%20it%27s%20dark%20matter%
27s%20gravity%20not%20dark%20energy%27s%20antigravity%20that%20stabilizes%20
the%20electron> sender | Reply to
<mailto:sarfattisciencesemin...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Puthoff%27s%
20Casimir%20model%20vs%2E%20Jack%27s%20ZPE%20dark%20matter%20model%3A%20it%2
7s%20dark%20matter%27s%20gravity%20not%20dark%20energy%27s%20antigravity%20t
hat%20stabilizes%20the%20electron> group | Reply
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxaXQ
2cXNoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzODUyMjEEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1OTEwMzM4BG1zZ0lkAzE
2MjEwBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTMwNjk4MzQ1OQ--?act=reply&messageNum=1
6210> via web post |
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJla2l
lOWJ2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzODUyMjEEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1OTEwMzM4BHNlYwNmdHI
Ec2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMwNjk4MzQ1OQ--> Start a New Topic 

Messages in this topic
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars/message/16210;_ylc=X3
oDMTM2bnFlNDAxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzODUyMjEEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1OTEwMzM4BG
1zZ0lkAzE2MjEwBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMwNjk4MzQ1OQR0cGNJZAMxNjIxMA
-->  (1) 

Recent Activity: 

 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZjlxcjNj
BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzODUyMjEEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1OTEwMzM4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xr
A3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTMwNjk4MzQ1OQ--> Visit Your Group 

These are the logs of the starship NCC-1701-280Z.  Its five-year mission to
seek out new minds, new quantum realms.  To boldly explore physics where no
physicist  has gone before (in physical, virtual, or quantum worlds)!

Starmind(tm) -- Your daily journal to the industry's brightest stars.  You
get infinite knowledge only with Starmind:

All hits.  All Physics. All the time.  And now in parallel and diverging
universes.  (Thus proving they don't exist as separate entities --But have
we gotten to them yet or not?)

** Patronize any Yahoo! Group Sponsor at your own risk.

- - - - - - Message From Starfleet  - - - (Read below) - - - - - - - - - - -
To change any characteristic of your online membership access, visit via
web:
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/SarfattiScienceSeminars

Join in our ongoing discussions and theoretical science writings:
http://groups.yahoo.com/messages/SarfattiScienceSeminars

Dr. Sarfatti may be reached at his e-mail or using Internet site:
http://stardrive.org
http://www.1st-books.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
To respond or comment directly to the group's archive, reply via e-mail:

sarfattisciencesemin...@yahoogroups.com



 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkb3NwazU0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIzO
DUyMjEEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1OTEwMzM4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzA2OTgzNDU5>
Yahoo! Groups

Switch to:
<mailto:sarfattiscienceseminars-traditio...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change%2
0Delivery%20Format:%20Traditional> Text-Only,
<mailto:sarfattiscienceseminars-dig...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email%20Deliv
ery:%20Digest> Daily Digest .
<mailto:sarfattiscienceseminars-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscr
ibe> Unsubscribe .  <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Use

.

 
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=2385221/grpspId=1705910338/msgId
=16210/stime=1306983459/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3> 

__,_._,___

Reply via email to