r 16, 2014 8:28 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Is the beginning of the end of the ECat saga?
>
> Why would anyone rational care what what the pseudo-skeptics have to say
> anymore?
>
> They used to be relevant but they aren't anymore. Too much is going on
> now for them to be ab
: Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the beginning of the end of the ECat saga?
Why would anyone rational care what what the pseudo-skeptics have to say
anymore?
They used to be relevant but they aren't anymore. Too much is going on now
for them to be able to i
When I read Beaudette key page, I thing that like dinosaurs they did not
evolve since 1989
"Unfortunately, *physicists did not generally claim expertise in
calorimetry*, the measurement of calories of heat energy. Nor did they
countenance clever chemists declaring hypotheses about nuclear physics.
Why would anyone rational care what what the pseudo-skeptics have to say
anymore?
They used to be relevant but they aren't anymore. Too much is going on now
for them to be able to impede progress much.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> This is sort of a microcosm of 89' a
This is sort of a microcosm of 89' all of again in terms of skepticism. The
excess heat is almost undoubtedly real, but let's make it about the
integrity of nuclear product measurements. Pomp is doing the same red
herring shit that Hueizenga, Close, Parker, etc. engaged in.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at
The source of the energy is irrelevant to the existence of excess energy.
The ECAT shouldn't fall based on incorrect and ultimately irrelevant
beliefs of why it functions.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:43 PM, H Veeder wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> *From:*
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* H Veeder
>
>
>
> Doesn't look good for Rossi, but I am not sure I understand Pomp's point.
> Is Pomp saying Rossi is rewriting history to make it look like Ni62 was
> present in the ash of his earlier EC at?
> http://stephanpomp.bl
From: H Veeder
Doesn't look good for Rossi, but I am not sure I understand Pomp's point.
Is Pomp saying Rossi is rewriting history to make it look like Ni62 was
present in the ash of his earlier EC at?
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/mr-rossi-i-admire-you.html
Harry
No, he
Doesn't look good for Rossi, but I am not sure I understand Pomp's point.
Is Pomp saying Rossi is
rewriting history to make it look
Ni62 was present in the ash of his earlier
EC
at?
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/mr-rossi-i-admire-you.html
Harry
9 matches
Mail list logo
