Dr. Swartz,
Yes, that helps to greatly increase my confidence in what you've achieved.
I know you have put a great deal of time, effort, thought, and money into
this over the years to achieve something remarkable. I'm looking forward
to your papers and what you will achieve in the future.
Best
At 07:17 AM 7/11/2013, Jack Cole wrote:
Dr. Swartz,
Thank you for responding. I had not realized
the lengths to which you went to try to match
the impedance, which must be very difficult with
the changing impedance of the active
material. With the leads being the same, you
would have had
ve CF/LANR
systems since March 23, '89.
Am busy working on a write-up of the effects wrought upon nanostructured
CF/LANR systems by applied magnetic field intensities, at this very moment.
Best regards,
Mitchell
--
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:17:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jet
for me to work with.
If people doubt Mitch's work, I would point out that the NANOR's where run at
MIT within the a department dealing with Electronics. I am sure that any
obvious errors would be quickly ruled out.
D2
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:17:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jet E
Dr. Swartz,
Thank you for responding. I had not realized the lengths to which you went
to try to match the impedance, which must be very difficult with the
changing impedance of the active material. With the leads being the same,
you would have had times where the control impedance was greater t
At 04:53 PM 7/4/2013, Jack Cole wrote:
In my electrolysis research, I found that the wire leads for my
control runs made a significant difference. Obviously, thinner wire
connecting to the joule heater resulted in less power being
dissipated in the joule heater and more being dissipated in th
That makes sense to me. I suppose he hasn't done so because of the high
cost of material. I may have to watch his videos again to see if he
addressed this. I know he has put a great deal of thought into the
calorimetry, but it needs to be scaled up.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Jed Rothwell
I wrote:
> Duncan knows a great deal about microcalorimeters, including the type that
> can measure the heat from a single cosmic ray collision. These devices are
> fundamentally different in design from what Swartz uses, and what other
> cold fusion researchers use.
>
The NRL and Tsinghua U. us
Jack Cole wrote:
> Could the apparent excess heating in this device be related to the same
> phenomena (i.e., power dissipation in electrical leads vs. where the
> measurements are taking place)?
>
I do not know but it sounds plausible. I have heard of similar errors. With
such tiny power level
In my electrolysis research, I found that the wire leads for my control
runs made a significant difference. Obviously, thinner wire connecting to
the joule heater resulted in less power being dissipated in the joule
heater and more being dissipated in the wire leads. I had initially
thought the w
10 matches
Mail list logo
