Nope
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 05:57 AM 7/18/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Tell me Lomax. Would you destroy the reputations of others to advance your
own.
I risk my reputation with everything I write, since I'm a known person. And
you,
I disagree. There is a lot that can be known beyond which has been commonly
discussed here as pertains to Rossi's device in its various incantations.
A few Phd's entered the scene with cold feet and limited access, obtained
incomplete data then reported their impressions months ago. In these
Tell me Lomax. Would you destroy the reputations of others to advance your
own.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 05:57 AM 7/18/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Tell me Lomax. Would you destroy the reputations of others to
advance your own.
Would you ask leading questions to preserve your own position?
I reserve what can be called personal attacks for those who
personally attack.
I risk my reputation with
Akira posted Julian Brown's recent criticism on Rossi in which he shares
Steven Krivit's skepticism, based on lack of scientific standards of proof.
Like Krivit, he cannot say that there is no robust anomaly, but only that
the proof is weak to non-existent; and that Rossi is not only stubborn, but
Julian Brown seems to be a clown. At least he is what you guys call a
pseudoskeptic.
BTW, I refer to the Julian Brown of the EPO, not this one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1878
It seems that this EPO's Julian mentioned that he worked at Oxford
during the 80's, to make some kind of smoke screan with Julian Brown
from Oxford. They do not have anything to do with each other:
Daniel,
They are the same person.
JS Brown, formerly of Oxford is the same Julian Brown, now with the EPO.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rocha
BTW, I refer to the Julian Brown of the EPO, not this one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1878
So, why does he uses the Oxford address? That doesn't make sense since
the EPO's Julian, according to himself, was just in Oxford only during
the 80's.
At 04:54 PM 7/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Julian Brown seems to be a clown. At least he is what you guys call a
pseudoskeptic.
I'll be blunt. You are an idiot, Mr. Rocha.
Brown shows no signs of being a pseudoskeptic, he did not knee-jerk
reject Rossi's work, and apparently travelled to see
Did you read my following messages?
At 05:04 PM 7/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
It seems that this EPO's Julian mentioned that he worked at Oxford
during the 80's, to make some kind of smoke screan with Julian Brown
from Oxford. They do not have anything to do with each other:
At 05:24 PM 7/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, why does he uses the Oxford address? That doesn't make sense since
the EPO's Julian, according to himself, was just in Oxford only during
the 80's.
Serious Imagination Deficiency.
How come? as an argument. People sometimes use academic
Also an email from Oxford, included in a paper 18 years after he
left the institution.
15 matches
Mail list logo
