Axil Axil wrote:
One of the cornerstone assumptions that underpin the understanding of LENR
> is that the fundamental forces of nature are not really fundamental but
> emergent from more basic structures of reality.
>
That is not "the" cornerstone assumption. It is *your*
Peter Gluck wrote:
> First thanks for coming with a new guru's teaching, the former one
> (Joe Murray) has inspired you ideas as flow multiplier watermeters,
> half empty pipes inside a plant . . .
>
He did not inspire that. A gravity return pipe of this size
Jed,
First thanks for coming with a new guru's teaching, the former one
(Joe Murray) has inspired you ideas as flow multiplier watermeters,
half empty pipes inside a plant, a 40mm steam pipe and clairvoyant witnesses
all informing you to know that the watermeter is qudrupling the flow values.
One of the cornerstone assumptions that underpin the understanding of LENR
is that the fundamental forces of nature are not really fundamental but
emergent from more basic structures of reality. Because the strong and the
weak force depend on other more fundamental aspects of reality, if those
In Gluck's blog, he wrote:
"A recent example is expert Rick Smith using them in order to demonstrate
that the 1MW plant of Andrea Rossi has circulated water not steam and the
steam - if formed could not be superheated- so he ignored one critical
detail - that the fluid had a temperature of
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-7-2017-lenr-and-thermodynamics-1.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
6 matches
Mail list logo