As far as I know, Stanley Meyer sincerely believed that his devices could
make energy from plain water.
How the heck does one flummox oneself into that conclusion? How long would
it take to test conclusively a purported device said to do that? A
minute? Less -- it would never be able to
On 11/13/2011 4:19 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
... With just a moment of thought, I can remember some of the most
prominent recent scams promoted by Allan on his site. One of these
is, of course, Steorn. ...
Allan (or at least Hank) is still promoting Steorn. Checkout this
fairly recent and very
The web site belongs to Leonardo Corp. It matters not who wrote the
words as long as they are the words of the web site owner. You again
attempt to cast into doubt credibility of Rossi and statements made on
the Leonardo web site by involving the credibility of an unknown writer.
Mary you do
Aussie, I too have hard time to think what could be the motivation for
Mary to do what she is doing, because there could not be any positive
outcome for her. If eCat is for real, like it seems to be, then Mary
just loses all the credibility and is required to change her name if
she is ever going
Quite frankly, The fact that Allan seems to posses what many might consider
less than well vetted reports is irrelevant to the discussion of his reporting
on Rossi. This was another dispicaple example of krivit exploiting the
investigative content and style of an individual practicing the same
It matters not who the web site administrator is or who typed the text
on the pages. The web site is owned by Leonardo Corp, it is their
official web site and any pages there are approved and binding on that
corporation.
So stop with the Sterling references. It does not matter and has no
In Allan's case he performed no crime other than simply reporting on the
alleged Obama event. IMHO, Allan showed professionalism by NOT adding his
own personal thoughts and personal beliefs on the matter.
So let's see. If I send a report to Allan about my pink, invisible, flying
unicorns that
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's see. If I send a report to Allan about my pink, invisible,
flying unicorns that eat nickel and fart hydrogen he should report that
too? I disagree. I think a journalist must use judgement in choosing what
to report.
I agree. It was silly for
That's unconscionable. I can give examples if you like but I'd rather
not waste more space. . . .
Please do. That would not be a waste of space. You tend to make blanket
accusations without specifics. Let's hear some specifics. It may be that
what you consider unethical, others consider
2011/11/13 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's see. If I send a report to Allan about my pink, invisible,
flying unicorns that eat nickel and fart hydrogen he should report that
too? I disagree. I think a journalist must use judgement in
Krivit seems to have good contacts who are willing to talk to him,
including some at the U of Bologna and U of Uppsala and many scientists who
work in cold fusion and LENR.
So do I. As far as I know, the people in Bologna and Uppsala have been
telling Krivit just the opposite of what he
I never even checked the site out to find all this stuff -- however, I'm
tolerant of really weird claims, because at least they introduce a bit of
openness within our overwrought 3D space 1D time virtual reality
simulation, within fabulous single entire unified creative fractal
hyperinfinity...
Not everything there is a scam. At least one is not, which is plasma focus,
which they frequently feature among the top 5 and is based in an old
technology. But they never claimed overunity, just 1/10 of the input
energy, in the form of neutrons. Actually, a few of their shots is enough
to
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Not everything there is a scam. At least one is not, which is plasma
focus, which they frequently feature among the top 5 and is based in an old
technology. But they never claimed overunity, just 1/10 of the input
2011/11/13 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com:
It is harmful to our society to have people believing that you
can run a car on water without fuel or even that adding on-board
electrolysis to an internal combustion engine will somehow magically double
it's mileage figures.
That is egoistic
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure but it really is a waste of space. Here are some of the idiotic
nonsense actively promoted on Sterling's pages... as if Obama going to
Mars alone wasn't enough. Tell you what-- rather than my boring everyone,
choose from the list here:
http://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/News/Upcoming/index.html
Next Few Months
* New customers of the one megawatt E-Cat plant reveal their identity
publicly.
* Location of first E-Cat factory in the United States revealed.
Next Few Months
* New customers of the one megawatt E-Cat plant reveal their identity
publicly.
* Location of first E-Cat factory in the United States revealed.
And why do you believe that will happen? Because Sterling Allan wrote it?
He's the same guy who had Obama in Mars for
18 matches
Mail list logo
