Control is relevant when we are uncertain what is the cause and what is the
effect. This is often the case with medical research and Pd-D cold fusion
experiments. Here however we only have two variables that we are measuring.
We are measuring electricity in and all the rest is excess heat (lots of
Horace Heffner wrote:
May people have made this comment. Some, like Jed, directly to Rossi.
And I have the scars to show for it. He is mad as hell at me for what I
wrote to him today, which I also posted here.
A thermal pulse method is also a useful check on calorimetry functions
> during run
riginal Message - From: "OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson"
To: "vortex-l"
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:14 PM
Subject: [Vo]:No Control
I'm reminded of something recently stated over at the PESN web site,
author, Hank Mills:
Se
On 11-10-10 01:14 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
I'm reminded of something recently stated over at the PESN web site,
author, Hank Mills:
See:
http://pesn.com/2011/10/08/9501929_E-Cat_Test_Validates_Cold_Fusion_Despite_Challenges/
http://tinyurl.com/6a7zcw2
Specifically:
No Contr
When you have a black box, controls are valid when there is a double blind,
that is, the experimenter and the subject don't know which one is true. In
the case of humans, it is to filter the placebo effect. In the case of the
e-cat, it is to avoid fraud, that is, slightly different designs to make
Experiments require controls. Demonstrations only require observers.
I don't think AR is experimenting.
I do think that we are soon to see either a legal feeding frenzy or a
Greek and an Italian back having a romance. Unfortunately, I think
the former is more likely due to pride (as in a lot of
6 matches
Mail list logo
