Whenever any element seems to work better than all of the others, it makes
sense to look at the totality of physical properties for that element. Even
those which may not be obviously connected to the way in which it works
best.

To that end, one must ask: Is there any way in which palladium is unique -
in the sense of a singularity ? 

Yes, there is at least one - and the possible connection to LENR is not
obvious. There could be others, but there is one for sure, and I've not seen
this alluded to before in the literature - even as trivia, so it is worth a
mention. 

At this point, my original plan was to leave you guessing as to what the
unique physical property consisted of, but in the interest of full
disclosure, let's cut to the chase: after much diligence it has been noticed
that Palladium is apparently the only element in the periodic table where
there are elements with a lower atomic number which nevertheless have more
electron shells! 

Doooh, do I hear someone mumbling "where's the beef"? Well, you might say
that this so-called singular property is a bit underwhelming to begin with,
since it is dependent on precise wording. Maybe so. Still it does indicate
uniqueness in electron structure; and presumably electron orbitals are the
first problem, at the angstrom level, which an approaching deuteron must
deal with if it wants to react . to wax a bit anthropomorphic.

This is a type of structural parsimony that is likely to be more interesting
in the context of other properties, who knows? My main concern is - does
this property relate in any other non-obvious or compound way, which is
useful to promoting robust LENR ? Does it imply a way to look for other
elements or alloys that can do it better? 

The answer is yes, but I will leave you guessing on that one.

Jones

Reply via email to