[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Pluralism in Science​​: A Call to Action​

2016-01-04 Thread Lennart Thornros
I do not know that we need a new philosophy (not qualified to judge about that). However, having said that I agree with most of the writing (the excerpt from H Chang's book). 'There are always two possibilities' is a rule I think is a simpler way of accepting something similar to what you propose.

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Pluralism in Science​​: A Call to Action​

2016-01-04 Thread H Veeder
>From off list Dear H. Veeder, I think the link I provide below is well suited to your Vortex thread and is rather self-explanatory. Perhaps you would post it there, as a reply (received privately). http://philosophypeterkinane.com/ Regards, Peter Kinane On Wed, Dec 2

[Vo]:Pluralism in Science​​: A Call to Action​

2015-12-23 Thread H Veeder
The post ​b elow ​includes part A of chapter 5 from the book ​ Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism ​ by ​ Hasok Chang ​, 2012.​ (available on amazon.com) link to complete C ​hapter 5​: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxxczzEYA5C5aHRQUTdoN3o2d3c/view?usp=sharing Chapter 5. Plur