ssage-
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:12 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Proton radius in question, after 3 years the textbooks may
need to be corrected...
BTW, is this actually a challenge for QED theory, or does it mean that a
c
BTW, is this actually a challenge for QED theory, or does it mean that
a closer study of QED theory predicts the new result, i.e. the proton
radius will vary with the presence of muons or electrons?
harry
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> It will be most interesting if they f
It will be most interesting if they find through further measurements
the proton radius depends on whether muons or electrons are used in
the measurement.
harry
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
> This might tie in to what Jones has been saying in a number of vortex
> postin
This might tie in to what Jones has been saying in a number of vortex
postings.
Is the radius of a proton wrong?
http://phys.org/news/2013-02-textbook-radius-proton-wrong.html
Apparently after 3 years now, they still cannot find an error in the data
which suggests that the textbooks are wr
4 matches
Mail list logo
