Axil, I value your thoughts and opinion very much, but I keep looking at those waterspouts pulling an intense vacuum, condensing water vapor along their surface and decaying over time and I am starting to believe the Sun is spitting large energetic, decaying super symmetric particles/strings at us within her gravity field, which I think is not smooth and actually kind of frumpy, like Einstein's hair... We know it as our weather.
Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Sunday, June 2, 2013, Axil Axil wrote: > Big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, together with the precise WMAP > cosmic baryon density, makes tight predictions for the abundances of the > lightest elements. > > Deuterium and 4He measurements agree well with expectations, but 7Li > observations lie a factor 3 - 4 below the BBN+WMAP prediction. This 4 - 5 > mismatch constitutes the cosmic "lithium problem," with disparate solutions > possible. (1) Astrophysical systematics in the observations could exist but > are increasingly constrained. (2) Nuclear physics experiments provide a > wealth of well-measured cross-section data, but 7Be destruction could be > enhanced by unknown or poorly-measured resonances. > > Physics beyond the Standard Model can alter the 7Li abundance, though D > and 4He must remain unperturbed; Physics is inventing outlandish theories > for this puzzle including decaying Super symmetric particles and > time-varying fundamental constants. Present and planned experiments could > reveal which (if any) of these is the solution to the problem. > > Why dose's Astrophysics consider LENR??? Because they have a closed mind > toward LENR! > > http://sait.oat.ts.astro.it/MSAIt780307/PDF/2007MmSAI..78..476G.pdf > > The electron screening of lithium nuclear reactions are as high as 17.4 > MeV. > Clearly, LENR is why there is a "Lithium Problem" ,but if science can't > believe that, "Lithium Problem" will always remains a comic mystery. > > > http://www.newscientist.com/special/13-more-things >
