Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]: Defkalion: "We have Rossi's formula"

2011-11-29 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > If it’s all a hoax, gotta ask yourself, why would Rossi go to all the > trouble of completely changing the reactor? If the thing is NOT producing > any excess power, and if the Ni powder is NOT melting, WHY

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]: Defkalion: "We have Rossi's formula"

2011-11-29 Thread Mary Yugo
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint < zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > ** ** > > If it’s all a hoax, gotta ask yourself, why would Rossi go to all the > trouble of completely changing the reactor? If the thing is NOT producing > any excess power, and if the Ni powder is NOT melt

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]: Defkalion: "We have Rossi's formula"

2011-11-29 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Key statement by DGT in the Ny Teknik article is the following: "It's very simple but they didn't think about it. (...) We solved the problem. Because the problem is that he cannot spread the reaction all over the pipe, and all the heating is concentrated in the middle", Xanthoulis told Ny Teknik.