noone noone wrote:
I think the NRC can try, but it will not last long.
I am a bit more concerned about the powers that be trying to tax the
energy produced to high heaven.
It would be difficult to do this, because the energy will eventually be
generated on site by small machines. To tax it
: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Steam hotter than 110 °C / Internal
heater
noone noone wrote:
I think the NRC can try, but it will not last long.
I am a bit more concerned about the powers that be trying to tax the
energy produced to high heaven.
It would be difficult to do
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 6:51:50 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Steam hotter than 110 °C /
Internal heater
noone noone wrote:
I think the NRC can try, but it will not last long.
I am a bit more concerned about the powers that be trying to tax the
energy produced
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 10 May 2011 09:51:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
... besides, I suspect that any government trying to do this would find that
their reign only lasted until the next election, at which point they would be
replaced by whichever party promised to repeal the tax. :)
Adding in pre-application time with licensing certification period for the NRC
review of a new reactor certification is 7-20+ years ...
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/02/nrc-has-four-certified-nuclear-reactor.html
Heck, it will take a first decade to get the science down and the NRC to even
I think the NRC can try, but it will not last long.
I am a bit more concerned about the powers that be trying to tax the energy
produced to high heaven.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 4:03:38 PM
6 matches
Mail list logo