Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: Fractional Hydrogen without Mills - Mathcad - table.pdf

2015-07-05 Thread mixent
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 5 Jul 2015 22:38:39 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Regardless, great effort is required to bring the H atoms in proximity to >the catalysts in Rande's containers for the energy transferring collision >to occur. Which is exactly why we are only talking about a wea

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: Fractional Hydrogen without Mills - Mathcad - table.pdf

2015-07-05 Thread Terry Blanton
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:28 PM, wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 05 Jul 2015 21:37:24 -0400: > Hi Terry, > [snip] > >I just seems improbable that all those H atoms could have had so many > collisions to account for most of all matter. Space is rather large I hear. > > I ass

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: Fractional Hydrogen without Mills - Mathcad - table.pdf

2015-07-05 Thread mixent
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 05 Jul 2015 21:37:24 -0400: Hi Terry, [snip] >I just seems improbable that all those H atoms could have had so many >collisions to account for most of all matter. Space is rather large I hear. I assume by "most of all matter" you are referring to "dar

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: Fractional Hydrogen without Mills - Mathcad - table.pdf

2015-07-05 Thread Terry Blanton
I just seems improbable that all those H atoms could have had so many collisions to account for most of all matter. Space is rather large I hear. Space," it says, "is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly hugely mindboggingly big it is. I mean you may think it's a long way down th