: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HyLENR : was: Britain reveals UFO documents
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Wed, 21 May 2008 19:01:34 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Particle physics = QM, so QM reactions means
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 22 May 2008 11:26:47 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
For lack of time I haven't gone back to my fusion rate maths efforts yet, but
I guess encounters would be closer by a factor equal to the shrinking factor
roughly, and since I remember you said fusion rate
PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HyLENR : was: Britain reveals UFO documents
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 22 May 2008 11:26:47 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
For lack of time I haven't gone back to my fusion rate maths efforts yet, but
I
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: HyLENR : was: Britain reveals UFO documents
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Thu, 22 May 2008 11:26:47 +0200:
Hi,
[snip
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 23 May 2008 01:42:01 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
I am sure it can! What's your take on the reason why deuterons fuse more
easily than identically charged protons BTW? Jones proposed a reason that
didn't convince me, namely that the extra neutron does some
I agree that if hydrinos exist, they are an easy explanation for cold fusion.
The problem IMHO is that it is too easy maybe, shouldn't we expect hydrinos or
deuterinos to fuse systematically, even in non-CF conditions?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that if hydrinos exist, they are an easy
explanation for cold fusion. The problem IMHO is
that it is too easy maybe, shouldn't we expect
hydrinos or deuterinos to fuse systematically, even
in non-CF conditions?
Not really. IMHO both
: was: Britain reveals UFO documents
--- Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that if hydrinos exist, they are an easy
explanation for cold fusion. The problem IMHO is
that it is too easy maybe, shouldn't we expect
hydrinos or deuterinos to fuse systematically, even
in non-CF
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Wed, 21 May 2008 19:01:34 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Particle physics = QM, so QM reactions means... reactions, right?
What I mean is:
D nuclei in ambient conditions D2 has some non-zero fusion rate.
The nuclei of a D-deuterino molecule must have a much higher
9 matches
Mail list logo
