tement... and one reason alternatives like M-theory
> are gaining traction. But until we have a QG theory, it's the best we have
> (and also works brilliantly per QED, QCD etc)..
> .
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Th
...@pacbell.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 6:57 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:New application of uncertainty principle and
> differential ZPE--
>
>
> *From:* Bob Cook
>
> Ø
>
> Ø Can any Vort explain the relation between ZPE
From: Vibrator !
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 6:11 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: New application of uncertainty principle and differential
ZPE--
It's not ZPE that causes uncertainty, but the other way around!
Due to the indeterminacy of wave function collapse there's a non
RE: [Vo]:New application of uncertainty principle and differential ZPE--That’s
what I thought—it’s a pretty vague connection.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 6:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:New application of uncertainty principle and differential
4 matches
Mail list logo
