Jones wrote:
| Oops, as you can see the Conference was in Cambridge. (where Violante’s
2003 paper was first presented)
| Letts and Cravens also presented similar work there with lasers but
apparently did not use the phrase
| “surface plasmon”… or if they did, then maybe they are
Jones--
I agree with you with the significance of the Letts Craven paper.
For a long time the laser stimulation of the Pd-D system was shown to reliably
cause excess heat. However, L&C indicate in the cited paper NMR was involved
in their opinion. This was because RF stimulation also wor
BTW – this is a fabulous paper in retrospect – especially if one is of the
opinion that the dogbone type reactors – by virtue of incandescent light
interacting in the alumina tube – are storing, collating and reemitting
semi-coherent photons, as a substitute for laser irradiation. There are a
n
Oops, as you can see the Conference was in Cambridge. (where Violante’s 2003
paper was first presented) Letts and Cravens also presented similar work there
with lasers but apparently did not use the phrase “surface plasmon”… or if they
did, then maybe they are the first.
– so the $64 questio
Hi Mark,
Thanks for that - but here is a two year earlier reference – and one not
encumbered by the ultra-cold neutron nonsense. It is a reference which comes
from Volante at a conference presentation in 2003 at Frascati. Was Widom at
this conference? If so, we have another attribution probl
Thu, Apr 2, 2015 2:58 am
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Widom-Larsen Theory
Jones wrote:
For the record, Fred Sparber started talking about surface plasmons
in LENR on vortex in 2006 if not before. It is a mista
Jones wrote:
For the record, Fred Sparber started talking about surface plasmons in
LENR on vortex in 2006 if not before. It is a mistake to credit this to W&L.
FYI:
It’s not my intent to get involved in the whole Widom-Larsen Theory
Controversy, but I think it would be disingenuous if
7 matches
Mail list logo
