ScottWm. Scott Smith
Re-Read: Fran's Clearest & Best Documented Statement:
I don’t think exotic nuclear reactions are behind the missing Gamma radiation
but rather our understanding of catalytic action and the theory of Casimir
effect. Presently we assume the vacuum fluctuations in Casimir effect are
“upshifted” such that longer wavelengths can not exist between Casimir
boundaries and the total energy density is therefore reduced. I am proposing a
relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect where the longer wavelengs still
exist and the boundaries appear to shrink away into the distance for a local
observer in the cavity. This is based on the paper “Cavity QED” by Zofia
Bialynicka-Birula, another paper on Relativistic hydrogen by Jan Naudts and
“The Light Velocity Casimir Effect” by Tom Ostoma and Mike Trushyk where the
measured velocity of light “appears” to increase due to Casimir geometry. My
point is time dilation better explains the seeming increase in C calculated by
entry and exity of light thru a cavity, it also gives an alternate explanation
of “fractional” hydrogen orbits in this environment as a relativistic effect
unseen by the local observer inside the cavity AND it would explain the missing
radiation as not only “DOWNshifted” but also attenuation since the
“contraction” we observe remotely is actually spatial displacement locally. We
are trained to think of relativistic effects as requiring near luminal velocity
to INCREASE vacuum energy density before dilation can occur but it would appear
that Casimir supression can REDUCE vacuum energy density by doing just the
opposite – spatial confinement – de- celeration or even “negative” acceleration
AND instead of slowing time from our perspective it accelerates
it.http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32155/relativistic-interpertation-of-casimir-effect-expanded/My
blog does not speak to the nuclear paths but I am convinced this relativistic
interpretation and energy density pumping above and below the disassociation
threshold for h2 provides the initiating environment that makes otherwise
improbable nuclear reactions probable.See my blog “Gas property of constant
motion disassociates h2 in opposition to changes in casimir force”. I think it
makes a strong argument as an initial energy source for the Rossi patent
consideration – where most patent offices treat this field like perpetual
motion this approach cites the inexhaustible gas motion based on HUP as
exploitable between inertial frames – something that excuses them from being
unaware since this simply doesn’t occur at the macro scale except at a slow
gravitational gradient – not to mention driving any rectifying device between
different inertial frames would take more energy than we could hope to rectify
at the macro scale. At the nano scale we have free motion of h1 and h2 courtesy
of HUP and thermal energy, If we suddenly have the ability to travel between
frames the removal of energy to the point of liquifying or solidifying gas is
irrelevant because it can be restored thru time dilation.RegardsFran
·I I I
