On 24.05.2014 02:58, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sun, 18 May 2014 17:27:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Just a FYI for those interested in superconductors and gravity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html
The propagation time of
In reply to linuxball's message of Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:56:41 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Hi Robin,
this is most likely a copy-and-paste error. It should read: The delay
was 63±1 ns,
corresponding to a propagation speed of 64c.
See chapter 8 of the following PDF sample document on page 32-34:
reading the article... shoot. That soundsalmost identical to a gravity
shielding experiment I created fictionally for my webcomic... Zounds!
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sun, 18 May 2014 17:27:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sun, 18 May 2014 17:27:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Just a FYI for those interested in superconductors and gravity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html
The propagation time of the pulse over a distance of 1211 m was measured
Just a FYI for those interested in superconductors and gravity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html
-mark
It says it's in a peer reviewed journal but doesn't say which one...
After careful testing, Podkletnov has found the speed of the antigravity
impulse to be approximately 64 times the speed of light (64c), which he
indicates does not conflict with modern interpretations of Relativity
Theory.
***I
6 matches
Mail list logo
