If somebody can understand this. please explain:
Mattia Battistich
October 22nd, 2011 at 9:59 AM
Dear Dr. Rossi,
1) A few weeks ago I remember reading a quote on you saying that by mid
October, a week before the test scheduled for the 28th, you would have
revealed the location where your first
My guess is that AR was approached by one entity who was really
representing a different entity. AR has now found who the first
entity represented and has learned that it wishes to remain anonymous.
LockMart?
T
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess is that AR was approached by one entity who was really
representing a different entity. AR has now found who the first
entity represented and has learned that it wishes to remain anonymous.
LockMart?
Well,
Thanks, very plausible. If this second Entity is satisfied
with a short test, it is OK for Rossi. Not for the value of the test. I ma
not very optimistic re the Customer's virtues.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess is that AR was approached by one
Maybe there was an acquisition since the arrangement was made.
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:29, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
If somebody can understand this. please explain:
Mattia Battistich
October 22nd, 2011 at 9:59 AM
Dear Dr. Rossi,
1) A few weeks ago
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Charles Hope
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe there was an acquisition since the arrangement was made.
That also fits the story.
T
Large companies have many different subsidiaries. It could be that
they had contacts with the industrial group X without knowing
that the one among the subsidiaries interested in the e-cat is
working for military applications. In US there are a number of those.
US because Rossi says that is
7 matches
Mail list logo
