Denis
April 12th, 2011 at 3:29 PM
Dear Dr. Rossi and Focardi
But these are my questions:
-1- You told that in October will be ready the first 1MW Energy
Catalyzer. Can you confirm this lead-time?
-2- Same question about the Patent. What is the forecast for the
Lead-Time of the
Rossi wrote:
2- a patent like this can request up to 6 years of processing
I do not know what that means. Rossi told me he hopes to have the
patent by the time of the 1 MW reactor. I took that to mean the
application will be filed, not granted. I believe that nowadays,
European patents are
--- On Wed, 4/13/11, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi wrote:
2- a patent like this can request up to 6 years of
processing
I do not know what that means. Rossi told me he hopes to
have the patent by the time of the 1 MW reactor. I took
that to mean the application will
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:36:36 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Since nickel, when used as a chemical catalyst, must be subjected to an
elevated pH before adsorption takes place, any number of pretreatments is
possible.
...so coating it with NaOH would not only result
I've been following this discussion for a while and now I think Mr. Rossi needs
to be aware that his intellectual property claims may be in danger. I can
understand that he would like to have it both ways. He would like to have a
patent and he would like to keep the essential ingredients a
Michael Foster mf...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been following this discussion for a while and now I think Mr. Rossi
needs to be aware that his intellectual property claims may be in danger.
He knows that. Many people have advised him of that, including me.
I can understand that he would like
That's just my point. Since he has publicly announced that the best mode is not
included in his patent application, his patent is invalid as soon as it is
issued. I'm quite aware that inventors play around with the best mode
requirement, but they don't tell the world before their patent is
Michael Foster mf...@yahoo.com wrote:
. . . Since he has publicly announced that the best mode is not included in
his patent application, his patent is invalid as soon as it is issued.
Did he say that? I missed it.
He is making a new application. I assume it will have best version of the
Rossi knows these problems very well, and he has already modified his patent in
december 2010:
Citation:
For overcoming the above rejection grounds against novelty and inventive step,
original claims 1 to 15 have been cancelled, and a new set of claims 1 to 9 has
been drafted and herein
Angela Kemmler wrote:
Rossi knows these problems very well, and he has already modified his patent in
december 2010:
. . .
http://www.esowatch.com/doc/application_rossi.004908.pdf
That is an interesting document.
This version is not searchable so it took me a while to figure out that
the
yes, indeed. D1 is the Arata patent.
Angela
--
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit
gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
The alleged nickel-enrichment procedure can not be found in his patent
application. I my opinion this is also a problem.
Angela
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de wrote:
The alleged nickel-enrichment procedure can not be found in his patent
application. I my opinion this is also a problem.
As I understand it, this would only be a problem if Rossi was aware of the
advantages of enrichment at the time he wrote that
The letter that Ms. Kemmler refers to in response to the European patent
examiner is interesting reading indeed. It seems to me that Mr. Rossi's
intellectual property position is really quite a muddle. I sincerely hope this
can be resolved in his favor. Like most on this list, I am hoping Rossi
14 matches
Mail list logo
