Re: [Vo]:Rossi Patent Final Rejection

2015-03-13 Thread Kevin O'Malley
This is all happening according to how I predicted: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98213.html On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote: > The patent office issued a "final rejection" of Rossi's patent > application. > > https://www.scribd.com/doc/25859

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Patent Final Rejection

2015-03-13 Thread a.ashfield
My reading of the rejection was that LENR was impossible because of the Coulomb barrier. It is not clear to me that Rossi's patent as it stands is of much use. He leaves out the critical bits about what makes it work at low temperature and with the COP he claims. You might argue that he was c

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Patent Final Rejection

2015-03-13 Thread Bob Higgins
Be careful not to read too much into the USPTO's stamp of "final rejection". It is not uncommon to receive this notice during the process of patent prosecution. I have issued patents, which, during the course of prosecution, got stamped "final rejection". It is time for the patent attorneys to d

[Vo]:Rossi Patent Final Rejection

2015-03-13 Thread Alan Fletcher
The patent office issued a "final rejection" of Rossi's patent application. https://www.scribd.com/doc/258595858/USPTO-Final-Rejection-Rossi-Patent I'm not surprised ... he didn't reveal anything of the internal structure or "catalysts", and recently added the Legano report as evidence. I classi