rgy balance. This is consistent with claims of both
radioactive half life reduction as well as some smaller claims of half life
extension for radioactive gases.
Regards
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 9:51 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re
The the study of Rydberg atoms/matter/cristals is a large new field in
physics. So there is uncertainty in its characterization.
Here is a reference regarding Rydberg atom/matter life expectancy. For your
converence, I highlighted the lifetime values.
Reference:
http://www.enotes.com/topi
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:17:08 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>There is strength in numbers, especially if large numbers of Rydberg atoms
>are coherent. This tendency for Rydberg atoms to sync up will make them
>very long lived because there will be no interfering wave patterns to
My opinion that Inverse Rydberg Matter has now changed to be of little
impact on the NiH reaction.
The evidence leading to this change of opinion revolves around the
formation of cooper pairs of protons as indicated by multiple examples of
superconductive behavior as explained in other recent post
See my post in this thread as follows:
RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Rydberg question from Francis
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:35 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:14:51 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >I think it is reasonable to assume that Rydberg atoms being far smaller
> and
There is strength in numbers, especially if large numbers of Rydberg atoms
are coherent. This tendency for Rydberg atoms to sync up will make them
very long lived because there will be no interfering wave patterns to
disturb the coherent ensemble.
See:
Viewpoint: Rydberg Atoms Jump in Bunches
ht
a concentrated
region of very rapid compression.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:15 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Rydberg question from Francis
Your theory has a lot of good points but I think one of us has a misconception
about Rydber
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:14:51 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>If not absorbed into the micro-powder, these large and excited molecules of
>all types will steal more Rydberg atoms from the envelope and grow even
>bigger.
Normal Rydberg atoms are unstable to spontaneous decay to
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:14:51 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Also, in such an excited gas envelope, it is safe to assume that some of
>these mixtures of Rydberg molecules will transform into the inverse type in
>time.
How do you envisage this transformation process taking place
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:14:51 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think it is reasonable to assume that Rydberg atoms being far smaller and
>more electrostatically nimble than the large molecule types will be ionized
>by the micro-powder to protons that will accumulate inside the
>
Your theory has a lot of good points but I think one of us has a
misconception about Rydberg matter .. and it could be me so maybe we can
hash out a couple things right now and at least one of us will benefit.
Sorry for the delay Francis.
I’ll start with a the small bone to pick that I have menti
11 matches
Mail list logo
