Cited from 5 jpegs taken Six Voltage Meter Triangulation Tests for Time Distortion Jpegs may also be viewed from commentary on this video if article shows problems of access.Published on Dec 17, 2015I am beginning to understand the principles involved with reactive magnifications of energy. If I choose to use a ferromagnetic transformer to light a short 4 inch neon using my 465 hz alternator source, it may take 500 volts for operation of the tube. However if an intervening " magnetic- ballasting" used as an air core transformer where the secondaries power the bulb itself it will ignite in operation at only 130 volts. In the ferromagnetic transformer case VI (in) = VI (out). This then is a transformation of reactive measurements where the gain of voltage by the secondary is accompanied a inversely proportional loss of amperage on the circuit. When three phase air core transformers are used in proper mutual inductance a situation where the reactive output can exceed the reactive input not only is possible, but is logical when the true parameters are shown. The whole issue becomes a confusion between a linear relationship and that of an exponential one. This is illustrated by the deception of the missing energy argument. If an energy stoarage as a capacitor is discharged to an equal capacitor, the energy content before and after is cut in half. Where did the missing energy go? When the transformation is viewed from the linear side we have two changes that of the voltage and the equivalent change in capacity where C goes up by two, and V is cut in half. Now view in comparison to what is happening on the true power transfer side of things where an exponential relationship exists.(.5) C*V squared indicates the energy content. By transforming the situation where C is doubled and V squared is cut in half for equivalent transformations this means an entirely different thing on the energy side of the equation. Now cutting V in half reduces V squared four fold; and to compensate C is only doubled; creating the observation that half of the energy has been lost in the transformation. Now just imagine if we could manipulate this situation in reverse only here the ratios of capacitive change are 272/1. Time Distortion Tests on 666 Machine Show ~ 400% Magnification of Reactive Input.http://reactive-input.beforeitsnews.com/energy/2016/01/time-distortion-tests-on-666-machine-show-400-magnification-of-reactive-input-2459156.htmlPioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
