In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:11:45
-0800:
Hi Mark,
[snip]
Robin:
Thanks for the comments, and I see your chicken-n-egg argument...
As I prefaced my comment about Horace's calcs, I'm not sure if this is
relevant either...
Please note that in many cases I am
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:32:09 -0900:
Hi Horace,
[snip]
In the process of changing their spin
axes the particles can (in a non QM interpretation) precess, due to
torque on the spin axis. When this happens the particles can
radiate, and flip their spins
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:48:59
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Primarily for the theorists in the Collective.
This from the Ni-H yahoo group...
-Mark
I try to explain it:
All you have to do is, to put the electron from the H-atom nearer
about 6 orders of magnitude greater than your 225e6.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:48 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Use magnetic fld to enhance effective mass of e-
In reply to Mark Iverson
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:08:00
-0800:
Hi Mark,
[snip]
Horace's calculation has nothing to do with alignment of magnetic fields in
clusters, which can't produce such huge fields anyway. (Consider that in an
ordinary magnet many (most?) of the atomic
moments
are parallel???
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 1:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Use magnetic fld to enhance effective mass of e-
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri
are parallel???
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 1:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Use magnetic fld to enhance effective mass of e-
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec
I wrote: However, if they are in orbitals, they align with opposed
spin, like so:
N S
| |
S N
which is still an attracting mode.
I should note that should say opposed poles, not opposed spin. A
nucleus with negative mu has spin reversed with respect to the poles.
I explained this on
Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 1:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Use magnetic fld to enhance effective mass of e-
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011
11:08:00
-0800:
Hi Mark
On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Horace:
The reference to the chicken-n-egg was not with your theory...
sorry for the
misunderstanding.
My mistake. Sorry. Any excuse to post on my theory. 8^)
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Primarily for the theorists in the Collective.
This from the Ni-H yahoo group...
-Mark
I try to explain it:
All you have to do is, to put the electron from the H-atom nearer to the
nucleus and Fusion will happen.
From the K-electron capture from Be-7 I know, that a
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Primarily for the theorists in the Collective…
This from the Ni-H yahoo group...
Add a smitch of neodymium and a dash of boron and you probably have a WMD!
:-)
HNY!
T
On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Primarily for the theorists in the Collective…
This from the Ni-H yahoo group...
-Mark
I try to explain it:
All you have to do is, to put the electron from the H-atom nearer
to the nucleus and Fusion will
13 matches
Mail list logo
