Rossi now says the minimum power of his device is 2.5 kW. If that is
true, it would be a good idea to study other materials such as Pd-D. I
believe they can be made much smaller than this, probably down to the
milliwatt level. (As things stand, researchers have difficulty making
them work
The power of an Rossi devices is proportional to the quantity of active NI
(NAE) if 50 grams give X, 5 grams will give approximately X/10 watts.
See e.g. Steve Krivit's writing about Piantelli- small generators.
From practical reasons, Rossi does not manufacture generators smaller than
2.5 kW but
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
From practical reasons, Rossi does not manufacture generators smaller than
2.5 kW but I don't see any reasons they cannot be much smaller.
I do not see any reason either, but a few days ago he said the minimum size
is 2.5 kW. I do not think he meant
I am an engineer have 40 years practice in chemical industry and I was
professor of Management of Technology for 3 years in a school of
Ecomanagement for directors, managers. Therefore I am not ready to believe
such an statement - why exactly 2.5 Kw and not 1.8 or 3.2? I am sure Rossi
can
I wrote:
Rossi has a highly original, bold, and idiosyncratic world view. He also has
idiosyncratic ways of expressing himself. So does Arata.
By the way, that would be true of Rossi even in the unlikely event he turns
out to be a con man with a fake device. No con man in history has done
It is really esential to not mix the points of view.
For example I wnt to continue surfing and discussing but is is past 23.00
and will sleep. See you tomorrow.
peter
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I wrote:
Rossi has a highly original, bold, and
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am an engineer have 40 years practice in chemical industry and I was
professor of Management of Technology for 3 years in a school of
Ecomanagement for directors, managers. Therefore I am not ready to believe
such an statement . . .
That's good. A
I suggested that there may be niche applications for Pd-D or other forms of
cold fusion, and we also may learn more about the reaction from it. I
suppose we should concentrate mainly on nickel cold fusion for the next few
years. But eventually we should revisit these other variations.
Why? Here's
Dear Cousin Jed,
A fine exercise in the high art of metaphor.
The problem is that fire burns always if the sticks are of the proper size
and essence of wood are dry and you rub them according to best practice.
For the time given Pd-D is not exactly so reproducible.
Seriously speaking if I had
9 matches
Mail list logo
