-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
> The heat pump is run by electricity. Right now electric energy costs
about 3 times as much as gas, so a 30 percent energy improvement is
not much economically speaking.
Yes and no. If gas were not a limited resource, in effect controlled by
On Jun 21, 2009, at 6:12 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Speaking of how politics and energy overlap...
Here is a "supercritical" way that the DoE could reduce natural gas
usage significantly:
http://www.r744.com/knowledge/faq/files/ecocute_all.pdf
The heat pump is run by electricity. Right now
This article describes a Japanese heat pump to heat water, which reduces gas
consumption by 30% compared to a natural gas fired heater. That's pretty
good. It might find a market in urban areas or for large buildings, which is
what the prototype in the article appears to show. However, for most wat
On Jun 21, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Speaking of how politics and energy overlap...
Here is a "supercritical" way that the DoE could reduce natural gas
usage significantly:
http://www.r744.com/knowledge/faq/files/ecocute_all.pdf
Why aren't we doing this here, or even talking a
CUTE and CRIEPI?
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Speaking of how politics and energy overlap...
>
> Here is a "supercritical" way that the DoE could reduce natural gas usage
> significantly:
>
> http://www.r744.com/knowledge/faq/files/ecocute_all.pdf
>
> Why aren't we doi
Speaking of how politics and energy overlap...
Here is a "supercritical" way that the DoE could reduce natural gas usage
significantly:
http://www.r744.com/knowledge/faq/files/ecocute_all.pdf
Why aren't we doing this here, or even talking about it?
Answer: the natural gas lobby is rich and po
6 matches
Mail list logo