I do not think I have EVER heard of a skeptic/critic ever change their mind
and apologize, for anything!
It's not even anything I ever expected to see.
What ever next?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:52 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
It was brought to my
John Berry wrote:
I do not think I have EVER heard of a skeptic/critic ever change
their mind and apologize, for anything!
Neither have I. It is remarkable.
- Jed
The original retraction from John Connett appears to be out at HSG
Hydrino Study Group Forum, maintained by Luke Setzer (my apologies for
misspelling Luke's last name):
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?f=5t=312sid=851e1815295c5d93648887358ed4869f
Luke replied:
I am locking and stickying
In all fairness - has Randy ever apologized, or even lamely rationalized to
his few ardent supporters, his specific plan for a demonstration unit of the
gas phase (micro-turbine) device in six months? I am referring of course to
the infamous Art Rosenblum interview of 1997.
Seems to me that the
From Jones:
In all fairness - has Randy ever apologized, or even lamely rationalized to
his few ardent supporters, his specific plan for a demonstration unit of the
gas phase (micro-turbine) device in six months? I am referring of course to
the infamous Art Rosenblum interview of 1997.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:03 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I, too, wait with baited breath for results long overdue, results
predicted to come from Mills Co.
They sold their first license to produce using BLP tech in Dec. 2008.
This year they began selling
I am still a fence sitter at HSG but just wish Mills would get the same
treatment as Arata-Zhang, Haisch-Moddel and other researchers in this field.
The Mills GUT may or may not be correct but it is obvious from results that he
is on a similar path to other researchers and certainly doesn't
From Fran:
I am still a fence sitter at HSG but just wish Mills would get the same
treatment as Arata-Zhang, Haisch-Moddel and other researchers in this field.
The Mills GUT may or may not be correct but it is obvious from results that
he is on a similar path to other researchers and
Jones Beene wrote:
Seems to me that the Mills' fanboys are due (long overdue) an apology after
13 years of waiting to see this demo, or at least at a minimum to know what
happened to delay it? ...
I do not know if an apology is called for. Anyone can be late with
fundamental research. But I
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A prominent CQM (BL) critic capitulates
Jones Beene wrote:
Seems to me that the Mills' fanboys are due (long overdue) an apology after
13 years of waiting to see this demo, or at least
Mike Carrell wrote:
In my personal contacts with Mills I have seen no arrogance, just
confidence in his own insight. Criticism without the work of
understanding is itself 'arrogance'.
Oh come now, Mike. If you do not see arrogance in the attitudes
expressed by Mills, you need a refresher
11 matches
Mail list logo
