At 07:39 PM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Thanks for writing this, I was also scratching my head trying to
figure out whether Godes and W-L were saying the same thing or not.
Minor comment: I think you typo'd "782MeV" when meaning 782KeV.
Yes. Thanks.
They are not saying the same thing, t
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
> Spock's reply was something to the effect that: Military secrets are the
> most fleeting of all secrets.
>
Arthur C. Clarke said the same thing, except he was talking about actual
military secrets. He knew quite a few of them because he worked
experime
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
> Spock's reply was something to the effect that: Military secrets
> are the most fleeting of all secrets.
Episode 57, "The Enterprise Incident":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoUFbd9e-aY
@ 3:55
T
I was thinking about this overnight and I think the right answer is
probably somewhere in the middle. Suppose you are able to obtain a working
LENR device containing e.g. powdered Ni or a Pd-coated cupronickel wire or
whatever. You can certainly put the active material under and SEM and a
spectrome
Jed sed:
> There is nothing more ephemeral that a vitally important trade secret.
> Trade secrets about unimportant technology sometimes last for decades.
Stealing trade secrets is probably right up there with absconding with
military secrets.
I wish I could find a brief You-Tube clip
This is a very refreshing response. I certainly hope you are correct.
Jeff
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
>
>
>> I suppose that if this work all holds up, the mainstream scientific
>> community may get what it deserves for shunning the discipline: a
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
> I suppose that if this work all holds up, the mainstream scientific
> community may get what it deserves for shunning the discipline: all the key
> results may be locked up behind an impenetrable veil of trade secrecy.
>
That subject came up in the panel discussion; the
I saw this too. It's a quote. The word "proprietary" actually appears 6
times in the Godes document, in relation to this and other aspects of the
work. It seems unlikely to be an accident or temporary.
Celani also describes the "large" help of an unnamed Italian company with
respect to processing
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> Certain electrical
>> inputs to the cell were changed deliberately in a
>> proprietary manner effecting Q frequency content.
>>
>
> In other words, we aren't being told enough information so that this
> finding could be independently replicated.
>
Is the first comme
Thanks for writing this, I was also scratching my head trying to figure out
whether Godes and W-L were saying the same thing or not.
Minor comment: I think you typo'd "782MeV" when meaning 782KeV.
Jeff
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> At 03:06 PM 8/17/2012, Alan J
At 03:06 PM 8/17/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Unreadable for me.
Full paper :
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Godes-Controlled-Electron-Capture-Paper.pdf
Appendix A just lists a bunch of reactions ...
with NO dir
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Unreadable for me.
Full paper :
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Godes-Controlled-Electron-Capture-Paper.pdf
Appendix A just lists a bunch of reactions ... with NO direct
reference to WL (may be in the other Godes
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, you wrote:
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
Unreadable for me. Krivit is making a Big Deal out of this
presentation, and McKubre's co-authorship. I rather doubt that
McKubre has reversed his position on neutrons. It is not clear at
all that co-authorship represents en
At 01:17 PM 8/17/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 10:24 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:
>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SOA7Z4aIGnT_HrshnzNF6vTsgj4PULTBceDyUINIZG8/edit
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
A Hamiltonian with ⥠782keV can cause a
proton to capture an electron to yield
Can a cold neutron capture reaction create a temperature inversion like an
inhaling singularity can?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> At 10:24 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:
>
>> > From: "Terry Blanton"
>> > Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one:
>> >
>> >
At 10:24 PM 8/16/2012, you wrote:
> From: "Terry Blanton"
> Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one:
>
>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SOA7Z4aIGnT_HrshnzNF6vTsgj4PULTBceDyUINIZG8/edit
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
A Hamiltonian with ⥠782keV can cause a proton
Never mind, took out a '/' and got the link put back together...
-mi
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:25 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin ICCF17 Presentation
> From: "Terry Blanton&q
Alan,
The link got mangled and I couldn't get it to work... try tinyurl?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:25 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin ICCF17 Presentation
> From: "Terry Blant
> From: "Terry Blanton"
> Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one:
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SOA7Z4aIGnT_HrshnzNF6vTsgj4PULTBceDyUINIZG8/edit
They quietly endorse Widom-Larsen :
A Hamiltonian with ≥ 782keV can cause a proton to capture an electron to yield
an
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Whoa. 130 bar & light water electrolysis instead of gas phase!
Yeah, what a surprise.
T
I think that is their wet boiler?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Whoa. 130 bar & light water electrolysis instead of gas phase!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton
>
> Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/p
Whoa. 130 bar & light water electrolysis instead of gas phase!
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SOA7Z4aIGnT_HrshnzNF6vTsgj4PULTBceDy
UINIZG8/edit
My wife kept me up long enough talking
22 matches
Mail list logo
