Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to ask to people who follow the LENr domain whetehr or not
there is an official policy in Scientific Journal to reject LENR/Cold
Fusion papers ?
Yes. Most journals send a short rejection letter to any paper related to
cold fusion.
Ok, so nothing official, but clear behavioral evidence of a short clear
policy. A conspiracy ? (ah ah)
I note.
by the way, remind me to call for a Nuremberg trial on Cold Fusion. Some
people have to be fired.
They have done more pain than the banksters (to whom I find the excuse that
they were
Hi,
On 2-6-2013 18:28, Alain Sepeda wrote:
by the way, remind me to call for a Nuremberg trial on Cold Fusion.
Some people have to be fired.
I'm afraid you cannot compare this with the Nuremberg trial as some of
the accused and sentenced got a death penalty.
I don't see any death penalty as
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so nothing official . . .
It is official. All of the major journals have a clear policy of rejecting
cold fusion papers out of hand. All mass media newspapers and magazines,
except CBS and Forbes, have made it their policy to publish attacks on
when can I find something that i can oppose to those who say I make
libelous claims ?
even on you letter to nature to correct Caltech paper, I find nothing else
instance of bad science, not a general procedure...
about Nuremberg idea, I defend the principle of reasonable specific
punishment, yet
There may be a condition imposed on all who depend on LENR licensing or any
product availability regarding their corporate hiring practices. A lie
detector test should be a requirement of employment for their institution
which asks the critical question: “Do you or have you ever opposed the idea
From Jed
...
No laws have been broken, so there can be no trial. If cold fusion ever
succeeds
I expect the people who led the attacks will say they were for it all
along. They
will take credit, and they will be rewarded. That is the usual pattern of
history.
After the Three Mile
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
As a next step, all positive responses will be reviewed rigorously before
the holy office of the LENR inquisition for doctrinal purity to assess the
danger to the best interests of LENR.
I'm not sure if you are having fun
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A lie detector test should be a requirement of employment for their
institution which asks the critical question: “Do you or have you ever
opposed the idea of LENR to have ever put LENR at a disadvantage in
science.”
Don't be a wimp. Waterboard 'em! They
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:14:35 -0400
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A lie detector test should be a requirement of employment for their
institution which asks the critical question: “Do you or have you ever
opposed the idea of LENR to have
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
Don't be a wimp. Waterboard 'em! They are guilty until proven innocent.
I like it. Posters everywhere will show Rossi glowering at them -
like the picture at the top of Gary Wright's website.
I like it!
Gary Wright himself will be in charge of this
11 matches
Mail list logo
