Sent from my iPad
On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
about tritium, and NiH, in your vision,
does this mean some
d+e+p, or d+e+d happen like p+e+p depending on the available reactant (and I
imagine the geometric structure of the fields around).
the
Harry wrote:
Fair enough, but may be Ed's starting point is necessary for
your reversible proton fusion. Think of it as electron mediated reversible
proton fusion.
Jones wrote:
Astute observation. It is all a matter of probability.
But note in the prior post, the premise was stated, and
*I would think the 10^20 figure is based on very high temperatures and
pressures, so it would not be applicable to a lattice. *
Unless we consider the unlimited squeeze placed on accumulating photons
and electrons by the uncertainty principle.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:17 PM, H Veeder
Jones, you keep saying no theory explains LENR and keep suggesting reasons to
reject while suggesting your own explanation that is isolated to one part of
the process. On the other hand, I suggest a comprehensive mechanism that not
only can explain all observations wthout adhoc assumptions but
Seing the idea of p+e+p plus the fact it can only happen in lattice, in
some very specific situations, I naturally think about geometry, symmetry...
the error of free space nuclear physicist was to think in free space.
It seems Takahashi have similar ideas, but with different details...
and
Alain, Math is useless because it is based on conventional mechanisms. The
process CAN NOT occur in a lattice without violating the laws of
thermodynamics. The p+e+p is the only form that can also explain tritium
production. These requirements limit what is possible. Please take them into
I have not heard of any reports of tritium being generated by the NiH
reactor. Is tritium a dot that we need to concern ourselves about?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Alain, Math is useless because it is based on conventional mechanisms. The
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:02:06 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Consider exclusivity. For the sake of argument - even if there are found to
be two possible proton reactions, and one reaction is supposed to be
different from the known solar reaction, but the outcome is the same
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
When a gamma reaction is known to happen with the same reactant, how can
that reaction be excluded from happening, in a new scenario when both
reactions are given enough energy to overcome the fusion threshold?
Especially if one (the desired
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The p+e+p is the only form that can also explain tritium production.
There are other possible explanations for tritium -- my own favorite lead
is that it arises when there is lithium. It is true that some LENR
Prove me wrong. Tritium production only happens in the Pd/D system and not
in a Ni/H system.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The p+e+p is the only form that can also explain
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Prove me wrong. Tritium production only happens in the Pd/D system and not
in a Ni/H system.
I think this is obvious.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Prove me wrong. Tritium production only happens in the Pd/D system and not
in a Ni/H system.
I don't disagree. This seems like a promising conclusion. I'm not aware
of any hard evidence one way or the other.
Eric
Axil, tritium has been made using H2O, which is close enough. Tritium has been
made in the absence of lithium.
Ed Storms
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not heard of any reports of tritium being generated by the NiH
reactor. Is
Close only counts in horse shoes. There is always a small amount of
deuterium in water. That tritium could be coming from contamination.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Axil, tritium has been made using H2O, which is close enough. Tritium has
been
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:00:00 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
When a gamma reaction is known to happen with the same reactant, how can
that reaction be excluded from happening, in a new scenario when both
reactions
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
BTW - take an electron and proton at rest, that system has a mass of 0.511
+ 938.272 = 938.8 MeV/c^2. That is the total mass available to that system.
It cannot increase above that level unless substantial energy comes
about tritium, and NiH, in your vision,
does this mean some
d+e+p, or d+e+d happen like p+e+p depending on the available reactant (and
I imagine the geometric structure of the fields around).
the fact that d and p have different mass, make the reaction p+e+d very
different from p+e+p or d+e+d,
18 matches
Mail list logo
