Re: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

2015-11-06 Thread David Roberson
t; Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 10:41 pm Subject: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium FYI: All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid Paper: http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.pdf I think it will help explain how Holmlid had viewed/grasped the energylevels back in early

Re: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

2015-11-06 Thread David Roberson
Fran, are you thinking that this is a form of zero point energy? Dave -Original Message- From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Nov 6, 2015 7:21 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuteriu

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

2015-11-06 Thread Roarty, Francis X
berson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:20 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium Fran, are you thinking that this is a form of zero point energy? Dave -Original Message- From: Roarty, Francis X <fran

RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

2015-11-06 Thread Roarty, Francis X
@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium It’s very difficult to keep the terminology consistent. I think Holmlid would be wise to ditch the present designations and start over. From: Mark Jurich FYI: All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid

RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

2015-11-05 Thread Jones Beene
It’s very difficult to keep the terminology consistent. I think Holmlid would be wise to ditch the present designations and start over. From: Mark Jurich FYI: All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid Paper: http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.pdf I think