On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Some LENR systems produce tritium and this decays into He3. Could a
LENR system be engineered to supply enough
He3 to make this sort of hot fusion practical?
No, because tritium is a very minor product of LENR.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for this reminder.
Can you imagine any reasons why hot fusion researchers might divert
some of their own money into LENR research because it could advance
their own program?
Or will funding for hot fusion
On Jan 26, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Some LENR systems produce tritium and this decays into He3. Could a
LENR system be engineered to supply enough
He3 to make this sort of hot fusion practical?
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Tom Claytor has a way of making tritium based on LENR that might supply
tritium to the hot fusion program. Nevertheless, once LENR is understood,
who needs hot fusion? Public funding is not determined by logic,
That might be as good as cold fusion, according to some simulations they
did with some configurations. They surprisingly got a COP of 1000x.
2013/1/24 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=south-korea-makes-billion-dollar-bet-fusion-power
South
My response:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=south-korea-makes-billion-dollar-bet-fusion-powerposted=1#comment-18
18. jabowery
http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=my-account06:21
PM 1/24/13
From a founder of the US Tokamak Fusion Program to Congress:
The DoE
Sorry, I thought this was a case of plasma pinch. This is the old Tokamak,
so I mistook this project with another one.
2013/1/24 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
That might be as good as cold fusion, according to some simulations they
did with some configurations. They surprisingly got a
BTW: I don't know why rational fusion people don't continually rub the
noses of pseudoskeptics in this letter.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:23 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
My response:
This is not 'Fusion' proper; This is Plasma Breach Reactor technology. (which
'can' support
fusion but which would be so monumentally counter productive) and so much so
that simply using the Plas-Breach
Reactor in 'INCIPIENT'-Plas-Breach(restrained-eye)XO-Plasma bleed-through mode
provides
a
This type of hot fusion has three problems that have not been solved
or even widely acknowledged.
1. The fusion is between D+T. The tritium must be created because it
is not a natural isotope. The plan is to convert the neutron flux into
tritium which is fed back into the reactor.
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to have some big
science experiments running. Science is not about profit but having fun!
If plasma physicist would like really do something that could spawn profits on
a long run, then they should study helium-3 fusion.
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to
have some big science experiments running. Science is not about
profit but having fun!
Well Jouni, when over 25 billion dollars are spent, the question is
who
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to have
some big science experiments running. Science is not about profit but having
fun!
On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to
have
some big science experiments
14 matches
Mail list logo
