It looks to me me like our Navy guy is doing The Right Thing: getting a
ground floor patent that covers /everything/ that hasn't been done yet
in LENR. Necessarily he ties it to a theory; the one he's got, or that
he thinks has the best chance. I wouldn't be surprised if he repeats the
whole th
Oh my, guess I used a bad word! I hope that you guys will forgive me for such
a terrible suggestion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Jun 24, 2012 1:49 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
Dave typo’d:
“… and we can all go
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:57:24 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
In private email with someone not from this list, someone suggested to me that
the WL theory was the beast candidate so far for an explanation of CF.
I would suggest rather that it is the theory most easily accept
ex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:US government patents LENR
This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power
production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with
protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual
gamma rays been shown
It would appear the government has a double standard regarding cold fusion
patents.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM, David Roberson wrote:
> This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power
> production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with
> protons
This is an interesting patent that I hope is important to LENR power
production. Has the existence of heavy electrons that can interact with
protons and generate neutrons been proven at this juncture? Have actual gamma
rays been shown to be absorbed by these systems to the degree that is nece
6 matches
Mail list logo
