Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 4 Aug 2019 13:52:03 +0200: Hi, [snip] >Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there may be more. > >J.W. It's not clear whether you mean Cu/W is the input to the reaction, or the output from the reaction. Could you provide an example? Rega

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

Do you mean that you witnessed decays of (Cu64 or Cu66) AND (W185 or W187) in Russ experiment ? Arnaud -Original Message- From: Jürg Wyttenbach Sent: Sunday, 4 August 2019 13:52 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:ni and ca Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there may be more. J.W. Am 04.08.19 um 00:45 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com: In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200: Hi, [snip] Adding H* to any useful isotope would result in a much better energy gain in  the ran

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

Just to remind you: We produce/measure LENR reactions with up to 10x background signal in total. With individual lines much higher. The data is from an experiment of last year. I just wrote a piece of software to analyze the tons of spectra as CERN does too. Of course the figure I gave is just

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200: Hi, [snip] >Adding H* to any useful isotope would result in a much better energy >gain in  the range of 1..8 MeV at best. Adding H* is neutron like and >not always harmless... I would have thought that adding H* would only

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

This description reports a computer computation of possible variants of energy-efficient nuclear transformations of two stable nuclides to two other stable nuclides through weak force mediated transmutation, in which the laws of conservation of electric, baryon and lepton charges are fulfilled. O

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200: Hi, [snip] >I would roughly estimate that about 10^5 105Pd disappear for 3kW/s. Is "3kW/s" a typo, and if not, then what do you mean by it? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:05:31 -0700: Hi, [snip] >This is according to my older version of his theory which may have changed. >Hydrogen ions (bare protons) also qualify as self-catalytic but they are >usually too reactive. Bare protons can't catalyze anything, bec

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

Wait a minute. That looks like a Table for predictions based on a theory – not real measurements from experiment. From: Axil Axil https://youtu.be/jVwAEOxQPH4 Update to online LENR reaction prediction system   From: Jürg Wyttenbach   Of course! How else should I be able to give you an estima

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

https://youtu.be/jVwAEOxQPH4 *Update to online LENR reaction prediction system* On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 4:09 PM JonesBeene wrote: > > > > > *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach > > > > Of course! How else should I be able to give you an estimate?? > > > > Well in the case of Rossi he was able to borrow or i

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

From: Jürg Wyttenbach Of course! How else should I be able to give you an estimate??   Well in the case of Rossi he was able to borrow or invent numbers, while claiming they were measured with SEM and then when he has to swear to it in a court proceedings – he admits that the fake isotope date

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

Of course! How else should I be able to give you an estimate?? Jürg Am 03.08.19 um 19:38 schrieb JonesBeene: *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach * Due to our measurements the reaction  105Pd + D*-D*-->109Ag is always running and consumes some Pd. I would roughly estimate

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

From: Jürg Wyttenbach ➢ Due to our measurements the reaction  105Pd + D*-D*-->109Ag is always running and consumes some Pd. I would roughly estimate that about 105 105Pd disappear for 3kW/s. we have about 1018 there what gives quite a good live time for 3kW. Jürg – The silver which you predic

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

Mills made a terrible mistake when he believed his Hydrino model. The energy of H*-H* condensation is limited to maximally 2 x 496eV as there is only one SO(4) conform orbit available. This is almost 1 time less than real fusion (=LENR !! ). In my view it doesn't make sense to produce free H

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

Piantelli does have similar technology based on nickel - and actually (historically) he was the first by a few months – that is: the first to report thermal gain results without palladium - ahead of Mills in 1989 and only months after P&F. That did not stop Mills from getting the landmark pa

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2754156A2/en The useful metals, as described in WO2010058288, can be Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Te, Cs, Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au,

Re: [Vo]:ni and ca

>From the piantelli patent, just about any transition metal will support the LENR reaction. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 PM JonesBeene wrote: > If one subscribes to a Millsean approach, palladium is somewhat unique In > the Periodic Table in that it is relatively non-reactive with oxygen or > oth

RE: [Vo]:ni and ca

If one subscribes to a Millsean approach, palladium is somewhat unique In the Periodic Table in that it is relatively non-reactive with oxygen or other oxidants while having an ionization potential which is near the first Rydberg level at 27.2 eV. Nickel alone has no such “entry level” Rydberg v