Axil, I agree with where you are going here “This difference in the perspective of time is why we see no nuclear activity going on at or inside the EMF horizon”. Fusion artifact wavelengths must translate down as the frames deteriorates such that they are not lethal or even recognized as dangerous radiation by the time they leak back into our frame. It takes the gravity well of a neutron star to reduce the frequency of a laser beam escaping from it into space by over 10% and I am still suggesting that Nano cavities and self catalyzing geometry of the gas atoms within it can exceed those lose levels from a negative perspective, nesting much further down than just the familiar active Casimir sub 10nm range forming the hard surfaces. I believe that catalytic interactions in these cavities between the fractional hydrogen molecules of different frames can exceed unity, disassociating from heat and stress on the bond from changes in frames and then reassociation almost instantly in the local frame while still being pushed along into different frames that again weakens the threshold in a runaway-bootstrap stage that powers this dilated fusion. Rather than adding energy to accelerate toward C or using the mass of a collapsed star this method restricts the baseline vacuum density of the isotropy from passing thru the cavity, lowering the density of virtual particles in our macro isotropy below that of even deep space. The perspective of a Nano observer in one of these dilated regions would be an analog of our macro perspective of the near C Paradox twin. The Nano observer would as you said perceive everything as normal but see us in the macro world as frozen in time. R Fran
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2019 5:51 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:If Mizuno is correct, this design is likely to be theprecursor to all future devices Twin Paradox in General Relativity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjHLboK2M1g From the perspective of the people in the world outside of the EMF event horizon, the speed that things are happening on or inside that horizon is ultra-fast. But at that horizon, the speed that things are happening is occurring at a normal speed. This difference in the perspective of time is why we see no nuclear activity going on at or inside the EMF horizon. These nuclear reactions happen instantaneously from our perspective even if the radioactive isotope takes billions of years to stabilize. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:16 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote: There is no telling what elements will be transformed by the LENR reaction. When the LENR active agent get hold of palladium and deuterium, silver might be formed rather than just helium. The mesh should be examined in a SEM scan to see if there is some non palladium elements present on the nickel mesh. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:03 PM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote: From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch> * In the Mizuno case we certainly will see 4-He with a 4-He a part > that 106 of the 3-He part. Jürg If Mizuno is producing helium then it should show up very distinctly when he looks for it- since the total gas inventory is so low and the power is so high that the ratio of He:D after along run will leave no doubt. As of now – that evidence is lacking. It is too bad that we do not have more information now – as this experiment is uniquely positioned to see it and if fount then it makes a huge difference in what to expect from future devices. I’m on record as predicting there will be none, well … only incidental Helium – possibly unmeasurable. Mizuno clearly states nickel is the host reactant – not the tiny amount of palladium. Where is the reliable evidence for helium being produced from nickel/deuterium? Jones
