'Morning Richard,
My question still stands: Why?
Why is it necessary to have teams of lobbyists to promote action on
energy when it's all too obvious that many avenues have to be explored in
depth; avenues that have demonstrated at least some initial
promise? And it's really not an either/or
Richard,
I think this is an old posting that I missed; at least two days
old.
Philip.
At 07:28 PM 4/16/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Philip wrote..
The indication for a steady increase in research funding is
apparent across all science, except CF
And at this critical point in time, one wonders why
Subject: Re: ReRe: Alliance for NanoHealth, Dr. Mauro Ferrari
'Morning Richard,
My question still stands: Why?
Why is it necessary to have teams of lobbyists to promote action on energy when
it's all too obvious that many avenues have to be
explored in depth; avenues that have demonstrated at least
- Original Message -
From: Philip Winestone
Subject: Re: ReRe: Alliance for NanoHealth, Dr. Mauro Ferrari
Thanks Richard.
Uncle Sugar - LOL
The world is full of charismatic people, and more often than not - call me
a cynic if you must - their charisma inversely proportional
Thanks Richard.
Uncle Sugar - LOL
The world is full of charismatic people, and more often than
not - call me a cynic if you must - their charisma inversely proportional
to their usefulness. From what you say, lobbyists such as this
chap, feed the egos of the Sugar Daddies (probably related
5 matches
Mail list logo
