In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:46:34 -0500:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
Yes, but how can you be certain (other than by a the laws of physics
argument) that the tube is not contributing a novel lifting force when the
power exceeds a certain value.
I can't. I'm just explaining
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:29:58 -0500:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:11:03 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Michel Jullian wrote:
The tube doesn't oscillate because the process Robin described is
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:29:58 -0500:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:11:03 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Michel Jullian wrote:
The tube doesn't oscillate because
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Tubular Lifter (again)
For this to be plausible the tube could never be neutral. In fact, if the
tube's charge were to fall below some minimum
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Tubular Lifter (again)
For this to be plausible the tube could never be neutral. In fact, if the
tube's charge were
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:20:29 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
The upper positive wire produces a positive ion cloud beneath so they repel
each other. If I have understood the EHD account correctly, the force of
repulsion is predicted to be
)
The tube doesn't oscillate because the process Robin described is continuous.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Tubular Lifter (again)
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:57:25 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
The wire creates a positive cloud. The tube attached to the negative terminal
is
negative, and hence attracts the positive air cloud. This pulls the tube up,
and
the cloud down. When the positive cloud comes in
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:57:25 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
The wire creates a positive cloud. The tube attached to the negative
terminal
is
negative, and hence attracts the positive air cloud. This pulls the tube up,
and
the cloud down.
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:11:03 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Michel Jullian wrote:
The tube doesn't oscillate because the process Robin described is continuous.
For this to be plausible the tube could never be neutral. In fact, if the
tube's charge were to fall below some
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:11:03 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Michel Jullian wrote:
The tube doesn't oscillate because the process Robin described is
continuous.
For this to be plausible the tube could never be neutral. In fact, if the
Harry Veeder wrote:
I would like to reconsider the tubular lifter experiment which I mentioned
last week.
The upper positive wire produces a positive ion cloud beneath so they repel
each other. If I have understood the EHD account correctly, the force of
repulsion is predicted to be greater
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
I would like to reconsider the tubular lifter experiment which I mentioned
last week.
The upper positive wire produces a positive ion cloud beneath so they repel
each other. If I have understood the EHD account correctly, the force of
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:20:29 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
The upper positive wire produces a positive ion cloud beneath so they repel
each other. If I have understood the EHD account correctly, the force of
repulsion is predicted to be greater than the force of attraction
14 matches
Mail list logo
