Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
If you declare to run a 1MW reactor and if you declare that generate heat
with gamma radiation, then it's nuclear.
Is that what Rossi declared in his application for a permit? Did you read
the application or the permit? If you did not, you do not know
I just provided you with examples which are not the case. For example,
the isomer 180m1
Ta is very stable, but when it decays, it emits at an energy of 75KeV, which
is within the range of x-rays, that is, below 120KeV.
2011/10/29 Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com
The gamma ray can have a
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
That does seem likely. Perhaps that means he did not tell them there is
potential gamma emissions.
And what you think Rossi said? “Well, we want an authorization for running
a 1MW electric heater?”
I have no idea what he said. You are Italian.
You are picking up on small things. Just exchange wavelength to energy
in the quoted part and all is right, I was only talking about photon energy,
anyway.
2011/10/29 Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com
What are you talking about? You said that gamma rays had longest
wavelength then visibile
Yes, a typo kind of error.
2011/10/29 Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com
Oh, only a small error you think?
Energy =~ 1/wavelength
You said Energy =~ wavelength
*From:* Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:36 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:*
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to get a lawsuit against Rossi before asking it.
That's a shame. Okay, maybe you can find out if the people who signed the
report are registered as licensed engineers. See the thread I just posted
about Domenico Fioravanti. The U.S. now has
In the Piantelli-Focardi experiments they had either gamma radiation or
thermal energy. They did never observe both together. This is what I
have read in a paper, written by Focardi himself.
They can however not have had some ten watts of gamma radiation, because
they are still alive. ;-)
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
The truth behind might be this: Focardi /thinks/ there could be dangerous
gamma radiation under circumstances, but they never measured this and dont
know.
If so, then he has lied all time to us.
If not so, then he has lied to the authorities to
Am 29.10.2011 18:25, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Or the Italian authorities decided for some reason not to worry about
gamma rays, and did not order them to put up signs.
This some reason could be some Euros or something like that. Mafia is
everywhere ;-)
Am 29.10.2011 18:25, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
I think you should not accuse people of lying.
So dont do this too.
And dont say it is ridiculous to think about radiation.
10 matches
Mail list logo
