Re: Storms question about the induced field

2004-07-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
I mean to add . . . Edmund Storms writes: "How does a star at one side of a galaxy know that its gravity and momentum are being exactly balanced by a star on the other side when this information takes a million years to pass between the two stars." Do we know that it balances exactly? Perhaps cl

Re: Storms question about the induced field

2004-07-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
Edmund Storms writes: "I ask how a structure can form when the time needed for one part to sense the characteristics of another part takes millions of years to be communicated? How does a star at one side of a galaxy know that its gravity and momentum are being exactly balanced by a star on the

Re: Storms question about the induced field

2004-07-24 Thread FZNIDARSIC
In a message dated 7/24/2004 1:20:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This requires either gravity or some other force to be communicated much faster than is normal EM radiation.  No communication is possible at speeds faster than light speed. I ask how a structure can form

Re: Storms question about the induced field

2004-07-24 Thread Edmund Storms
Frank, your emphasis is on conservation of momentum, which is important but not sufficient. You also introduce the mechanism of sensing the existence of a fixed field, which is irrelevant.  I ask how a structure can form when the time needed for one part to sense the characteristics of another pa

Storms question about the induced field

2004-07-24 Thread FZNIDARSIC
The induced field is not superluminal.  Take the electric force for example.  The force between two charges is equal and opposite.  The system conserves momentum.  Now one charge is moved.  It moves into in the established field of the first electron and immediately fields the force.  No time delay