Re: [Vo]:GM VP reveals his true feelings

2008-02-26 Thread OrionWorks
A few tangential thoughts on the Lutz controversy.

I would caution us all from arriving at too many stead-fast opinions
as to the real motivations behind any individual without first
questioning them face-to-face. We're all guilty of performing
pop-psyche analysis on the motivations of others and, subsequently,
performing extrapolations on that analysis as to how their underlying
motivations are likely affecting the machinations of
multi-million/billion dollar corporations for which they are in charge
of running. I'm just as guilty as the rest for having performed these
very transgressions.

I don't know Lutz. I've never talked to him. I'm not in a position to
analyze his motivations publicly.

One of the few bits of wisdom I've seem to have acquired as I've
gotten older is a realization that the vast majority personal opinions
I've stuffed into my wet-wear are just that: personal opinions. I
think I became slightly wiser one fateful day (a day that
unfortunately only seems to have been recently) when I came to the
astonishing revelation as to what do any of my personal opinions have
anything to do with what's really going on in the world. All I really
know is what's going on in my little world, and even then, I'm not so
sure about that.

But that's ok. Having personal opinions about this and that subject
did not seem to make me any more of a productive intelligent human
being. Possessing opinions inevitably caused me to consume huge
amounts of personal resources and energy in the task of defending all
those personal opinions I had acquired because sooner or later I would
come up against some dumb jerk who didn't agree with my personal
opinions, and then it was off to the races again.

Granted, there are many of us who live for the thrill of the race, and
the stadiums always seem to be full of spectators. But for me, all it
seemed to do was make me more opinionated.

OTOH, has anyone spoken to Mrs. Lutz recently? ;-)

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.Zazzoe.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:GM VP reveals his true feelings

2008-02-26 Thread Jed Rothwell

OrionWorks wrote:


A few tangential thoughts on the Lutz controversy.

I would caution us all from arriving at too many stead-fast opinions 
as to the real motivations behind any individual without first 
questioning them face-to-face.


I don't need to question the man. I can read his blog. I assume he 
means what he says, and it seems clear to me that his beliefs explain 
why GM is in such a mess. The other managers there must agree with 
him, or they would fire him. Plus I have read a great deal about the 
industry, such as the book High and Mighty. Plus anyone can see 
that GM is not serious about hybrid cars. The Prius has been sold for 
10 years, and it took 5 or 10 years to develop. GM is ~20 years 
behind, they have not sold a single hybrid car. Obviously they have 
no interest in them! No corporation that wants to develop a product 
sits on the sidelines doing nothing for 20 years.



We're all guilty of performing pop-psyche analysis on the 
motivations of others and, subsequently, performing extrapolations 
on that analysis as to how their underlying motivations are likely 
affecting the machinations of multi-million/billion dollar 
corporations for which they are in charge of running.


I do not think I engaged in pop-psyche analysis. Assertions that 
concept cars are mainly intended as public-relations stunts can be 
found in many books and articles about the auto industry. It is 
common knowledge.


Anyone can see that GM is on the verge of extinction, and management 
is at fault. Look at their stock price, and the fact that they have 
offered a buy out to every single remaining employee. This is de 
facto liquidation. You can see from the statements in Lutz's blog and 
in the history described in High and Mighty how they got into this 
pickle. It is no mystery, and not an unusual occurrence. IBM almost 
self-destructed in the 1980s for reasons similar to GM: the managers 
did not know much about the computer business and had no idea what 
the customers wanted. This is described in many books, such as P. 
Carroll, Big Blues.


Large, dysfunctional, overconfident institutions often destroy 
themselves. That is why only a handful of corporations are older than 
a century, and why political parties that remain in power too long 
become rife with corruption and incompetence. The reasons and 
dynamics of destruction are described in the book Parkinson's Law 
which is a 140-page gem.


Along the same lines, it is no mystery how and why organizations such 
as the DoE, Nature and the APS got themselves out on a limb in 
opposition to cold fusion. Every step of the process is well 
documented. There is no chance they will change course as long as the 
people who made the original mistakes and jumped to the wrong 
conclusion remain in power.


History has many examples of large armies being defeated by small 
ones, such as the American Revolution and the Vietnam war. These and 
other examples are described in the book March of Folly. It shows 
how big institutions tend to make drastic errors that are apparent to 
many people at the time, and yet they continue to make them until 
they self destruct.


- Jed


RE: [Vo]:GM VP reveals his true feelings

2008-02-26 Thread Zell, Chris


Anyone can see that GM is on the verge of extinction, and management is
at fault. Look at their stock price, and the fact that they have offered
a buy out to every single remaining employee. This is de facto
liquidation.  
 
GM and Detroit in general cannot build small fuel efficient cars at a
profit.  Toyota and others are smart enough to build assembly plants in
conservative, white - and
often Southern communities, away from urban problems and hire YOUNG MEN
to work, so as to avoid health care and pension costs.  Even Lee Iacocca
groused about
this situation.  Competition has forced native automakers to offer
buyouts to shed expensive workers.
 
I can't blame unions for wanting benefits, nor management for trying to
survive.  We need a better health care and pension system to remove a
huge competitive
disadvantage.  New ideas alone are a waste of time because such can be
easily copied by foreign companies - and sadly, at less cost. 


Re: [Vo]:GM VP reveals his true feelings

2008-02-26 Thread OrionWorks
Jed

I learned some time ago that when I go to the races it's a good
betting strategy to wager that your opinions will make a place.

PS: Some interesting thoughts from Chris as well

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:GM VP reveals his true feelings

2008-02-26 Thread Jed Rothwell

OrionWorks wrote:


I learned some time ago that when I go to the races it's a good
betting strategy to wager that your opinions will make a place.


These are not my opinions. That's why I cited all those books. These 
are facts, teh opinions of experts, and observations such as the fact 
that GM sells no hybrid cars, even though their arch-rival Toyota has 
sold a million of them. That is an extraordinary fact, nearly 
unprecedented in the annals of commerce.


Historians often wonder how the early 19th century gap between 
industrialized England and the undeveloped U.S. came about. The two 
countries had the same language and traditions, but for a long time 
the U.S. lagged, and purchased technology from England. It seems 
puzzling. Yet that gap was not 20-years wide. Serious steam railroad 
construction began in the 1830s and 40s. (1829, Liverpool  
Manchester RR.) In 1830 there were no railroads in the U.S., but the 
boom was beginning. The first rails and locomotives were imported 
from Britain. U.S. manufacturers such as Rogers began building 
locomotives, and quickly surpassed the British. By August 1860 Rogers 
had shipped 946 locomotives, and competing firms had shipped hundreds 
more. The U.S. had more railroad track then the rest of the world 
combined. What has happened with GM today is analogous to an 
imaginary situation in which, by 1850, 20 years into the railroad 
revolution, the U.S. had imported thousands of locomotives and not 
manufactured a single one.


- Jed


[Vo]:Nuke causes massive power outage

2008-02-26 Thread Jed Rothwell

This is unusual. These things are highly reliable.


Nuclear Plant Shutdown Causes Massive Florida Power Outages
February 26, 2008: 05:23 PM EST

MIAMI (AP)--A problem with the electrical grid in Florida caused 
power outages stretching from Miami up almost to Jacksonville that 
affected as many as 3 million people Tuesday and caused a nuclear 
plant to automatically shut down, officials with the state's largest 
utility said. . . .




Re: [Vo]:GM VP reveals his true feelings

2008-02-26 Thread OrionWorks
Historical facts concerning the birth pangs of our country's railroad
system, and the comparisons alluded to in the current auto industrial
situation are indeed interesting. These are facts worth knowing and
pondering over since we may soon witness history repeating itself on a
similar issue - regrettably.

With that said, describing Mr. Lutz's at the beginning of this
particular discussion thread as an individual who does not seem to
know when he should have apologized for previous statements made, and
then not shutting up is:  an opinion.

Stating that Lutz  Co. really haven't the slightest interest in the
environmental cause is an expressed opinion as well, even if a lot of
the facts given to back up that opinion are, to say the least,
damning.

That is why I stated previously if Lutz  Co. continue to do what he
claims GM is planning on doing, I personally don't care what his
personal opinions might be. Perhaps the real question we should be
asking ourselves is: Will Lutz  Co. keep their word in spite of what
their true opinions might be. Or will they allow their real opinion of
the situation to continue driving a stake into their coffins.

The cited facts were far more interesting. thanks for sharing them
Jed. I learn a lot from your historical knowledge.

With that said, I suspect I'm in general agreement with many of the
opinions that have been expressed in this thread. But that's just my
opinion. ;-)

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Nuke causes massive power outage

2008-02-26 Thread Mike Carrell
Jed, you got this wrong. The power outage was caused by a fault at a 
substation, which disturbed the network and pieces of it disconnected to 
prevent damage to eqluipment. The nuclear plant connected to the grid was 
also vulnerable, so it disonnected and shut down it reactor for safety. The 
nuclear plant *did not cause the shutdown*.


The power grid is a huge amount of alternating current surging back and 
forth. Every connected generator has to operate in synchrony or risk 
spectacular destruction. Thus disconect or die. This is inherent in the 
system and is carefully managed. Someday there may be coordinated 
distributed generators, but that is decades away.


Mike Carrell


- Original Message - 
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 6:21 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Nuke causes massive power outage



This is unusual. These things are highly reliable.


Nuclear Plant Shutdown Causes Massive Florida Power Outages
February 26, 2008: 05:23 PM EST

MIAMI (AP)--A problem with the electrical grid in Florida caused power 
outages stretching from Miami up almost to Jacksonville that affected as 
many as 3 million people Tuesday and caused a nuclear plant to 
automatically shut down, officials with the state's largest utility said. 
. . .




This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. 
Department.