http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24638816
Nuclear scientists are being urged by the former UN weapons inspector Hans
Blix to develop thorium as a new fuel.
Mr Blix says that the radioactive element may prove much safer in reactors
than uranium.
'If thorium ever makes it as a commercial nuclear fuel, uranium may be seen
as a massive and costly diversion. Some supporters of thorium believe that
it was bypassed in the past because governments wanted the plutonium from
certain conventional reactors to make atomic bombs.
They believe thorium
One further point Lou. You wrote:
I also wish that other spectral anomalies were observed - besides the
broadband soft X-ray/EUV apparently due to hydrogen, but I believe that
the 19.29 nm line is due to the oxidized cathode/anode surfaces -
oxygen contamination.
Yes - this line is close to a
In re-reading this thread, one other factor is worth mentioning wrt the
oxygen connection to LENR. It does tie the Gen3 paper to Randell Mills via
the Rydberg levels of hydrogen AND oxygen (when aligned and slightly
unbalanced on the high side).
It could easily be true that oxygen is desirable
Don't hold your breath :
Andrea Rossi
November 5th, 2013 at 7:25 AM
Marco Serra:
Thank you for your attention, I sympathize with you. I do not know when we will
publish, because it does not depend on me, but surely within 2014. I dare to
foresee before August/September.
But this is not an
ps : Mark Gibbs and I get his seal of approval --
Frank Acland
November 5th, 2013 at 6:30 PM
Dear Andrea,
Is this the Ragone diagram you stand by?
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04-1024×624.png
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Andrea Rossi
November 5th, 2013 at 8:06
RPR then releases the hotter UV photon which can create another catalytic
hole (when slightly downshifted) especially in oxygen preferentially. A
limited chain reaction, mediated by UV photons, is the result.
In short, this hybridized version provides a more complete picture than
Mills,
David Suzuki issues ominous warning for damaged Fukushima plant
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/david-suzuki-issues-ominous-warning-damaged-fukushima-plant-195522191.html
David Suzuki has issued an ominous warning about the state of Fukushima's
nuclear power plant.
Fukushima is the most
Jones,
I will be delighted if your, or any LENR, theory is proved.
Hopefully, the experiments will be improved and repeated to the point
where 'The Establishment' cannot ignore them - if this is possible.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jones Beene wrote:
In re-reading this thread, one other factor is worth
and how long has it been since the 1 MW October test? Two years!
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 6, 2013 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)
ps : Mark Gibbs and I get his seal
Dear Alan,
On 6-11-2013 18:11, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Is this the Ragone diagram you stand by?
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04-1024×624.png
I'm afraid the file is not there anymore, as I get an 404 error.
Kind regards,
Rob
I think this is the same image:
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2013/rossitests2.jpg
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Dear Alan,
On 6-11-2013 18:11, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Is this the Ragone diagram you stand by?
- Original Message -
From: Frank Acland ecatwo...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 12:41:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Long-term test : LONG WAIT (Aug/Sep 2014)
I think this is the same image:
The new customer is still a mystery (invited visits and all that).
This is actually two tests
a) Presumably Levi et al
b) An internal test. 1MW? Hotcat? Something new?
- Original Message -
From: fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 12:12:55
So what are the in process evaluations currently?
There was talk of something like an Underwriters Laboratories certification
going on.
There was talk of the original 1MW plant undergoing evaluation.
Are there others?
What is the hold-up on manufacturing?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Alan
Alan,
On 6-11-2013 21:48, Alan Fletcher wrote:
It's funny -- I pulled up the Forbes image this morning !
Still there :
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04-1024x624.png
Yep I see, but there is a slight difference between those two:
The one that works has an x
I went back to the article :
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-rossi-e-cat-energy-density-higher.html
Originally, they just cropped the photo, removing my credits, with a short
caption. I left a nasty comment.
I just checked back and they've filled in the caption:
Ragone plot of the energy
The world of the fish is different from the world of the bird. The world of
water is different from the world of air. If we measure pressure in air, it
will read differently from a pressure reading in water.
Each phase of matter is another world that we must understand. When one
views the world
Jeff,
Looks like you have been imbibing on the BLP kool-aid...
comments interspersed below...
Do you glow-in-the-dark, yet? :-)
From: Jeff Driscoll
JB: RPF then releases the
*MFMP detects GAMMA rays in LENR
experiment*http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/3088346/posts
*Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/follow-2/347-gamma
* | 06 November 2013. | Robert Greenyer
*Well, to put it
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Jeff,
Looks like you have been imbibing on the BLP kool-aid...
comments interspersed below...
Do you glow-in-the-dark, yet? :-)
From: Jeff Driscoll
The title of the FR post is (annoyingly) misleading.
The MFMP team is saying that they are excited about putting a more
sensitive gamma ray detector into operation -- not that it has, as of now,
detected unambiguous gamma rays.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The pundit writes an article, which will trigger other articles, which --
perhaps in a matter of days -- may trigger an avalanche of interest. Public
opinion changes quickly in the Internet era.
***The MFMP finding Gamma
Good catch, James. I screwed up, misread the article. There's not much
doubt that Celani has observed gamma rays, but not MFMP.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:30 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The title of the FR post is (annoyingly) misleading.
The MFMP team is saying that they are
Of course, my misreading was pre-disposed by having seen this article first:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/11/mfmp-report-detection-of-unusual-gamma-rays/
MFMP Report Detection of Unusual Gamma Rays
November 7, 2013 • 1 Comment
There is a new blog post on the Martin Fleischmann Memorial
Why does the MFMP produce such execrable writing? That article reads that
it was translated from Urdu into English.
[m]
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The pundit writes an
26 matches
Mail list logo
